• You must be logged in to see or use the Shoutbox. Besides, if you haven't registered, you really should. It's quick and it will make your life a little better. Trust me. So just register and make yourself at home with like-minded individuals who share either your morbid curiousity or sense of gallows humor.

Sugar Cookie

Veteran Member
Bold Member!
1706293748702.png

When a devout Muslim woman pleaded with Tennessee deputies to allow her to keep her hijab on for a booking photo, they refused, according to a newly settled federal lawsuit.
Sophia Johnston was threatened with indefinite jail time in August if she didn’t remove her hijab for the mugshot as she was booked in Rutherford County on a six-year-old outstanding warrant connected to driving on a suspended license, the lawsuit said.

She saw no other option but to comply, as she has eight children and “could not afford to be incarcerated indefinitely,” according to a complaint.

Five men were present when she removed her hijab for the photo, the lawsuit said.
Before that day, no man outside of Johnston’s family had seen her hair since she was a child — as that would go against her religious beliefs, McClatchy News previously reported.
The lawsuit accused the Rutherford County Sheriff’s Office, which published her mugshot online, of denying her request for religious accommodation.

Now the county has agreed to pay Johnston $100,000 to settle the case, her lead attorney Daniel A. Horwitz said in a Jan. 24 news release.

The county has also “destroyed” her mugshots, Horwitz said.
“This is a historic win for Ms. Johnston and her entire religious community,” Horwitz said in a statement.

“Citizens have the right to practice their religion without unreasonable governmental interference, and we are proud to have vindicated Ms. Johnston’s rights and secured permanent policy changes that will prevent violations like this from recurring,” he added.
As a result of the case, the Rutherford County Sheriff’s Office has updated its booking and jail policies as of Jan. 24.
The sheriff’s office deleted all booking photos of Johnston without her hijab from its records on Jan. 19, according to a Jan. 22 court filing. Surveillance footage of Johnston without the hijab has also been deleted.

Johnston had hoped to accomplish this with her lawsuit, McClatchy News reported.

After Johnston’s arrest for a minor criminal charge in August, the charge has been dismissed, Horwitz said.


I am sure all the men who fucked her to give her eight kids have seen her without her hijab.
 
I can see it both ways, the only way to really identify her would be to see her without the hijab but this was a traffic offense not a murder. With a murder I do believe she should have to completely remove the hijab, but a traffic offense, no.
I'm with @cubby on this one. Big offenses you get the no hijab treatment. The small stuff I don't care either way. If you don't want to have to remove your hijab for a mugshot, don't commit big crimes. It's in your hands completely... :facepalm:
 
I would be horrified if I were to be arrested and the cops made me strip down to my bra and panties to take a mug shot. I am a very modest person. Nobody outside of my home has seen me in a sports bra and yoga pants. Because I am modest. There are plenty of people who wouldn't mind, but I do. Me thinkee that a whole lot of people do not realize that although THEY do not consider showing their hair to be immodest, they aren't the only people in the world. Others may think and feel that it does. I'd sue if I were made to wear underwear in my mugshot and I'm glad she did. That is like the equivalent of flashing the cops to her but so many people can't see beyond their own little feelers.
 
I would be horrified if I were to be arrested and the cops made me strip down to my bra and panties to take a mug shot. I am a very modest person. Nobody outside of my home has seen me in a sports bra and yoga pants. Because I am modest. There are plenty of people who wouldn't mind, but I do. Me thinkee that a whole lot of people do not realize that although THEY do not consider showing their hair to be immodest, they aren't the only people in the world. Others may think and feel that it does. I'd sue if I were made to wear underwear in my mugshot and I'm glad she did. That is like the equivalent of flashing the cops to her but so many people can't see beyond their own little feelers.
I'm totally with you on the modesty aspect. Which is why I generally don't do things that will get me arrested. I get uncomfortable if my Mom sees me in just a bra and panties, and I've known her for over 53 years now! But I do have to say that I find it odd that the rules have to change to accommodate what is essentially a criminal. But then you get the whole "innocent unless proven guilty" thing too. It's a mess. Part of me says just do what is "legal" where you live (on the part of police). Because they might make you take it off here, but what about the places where they make you put one on to take your mugshot? It's very complicated and boils down to keep your stuff legal and you won't have to worry about this crap!
 
It was a suspended license charge with a warrant from 6 years ago, it's not like they had arrested her multiple times in that 6 years, they didn't or this would have happened 6 years ago. If she were driving over pedestrians, sideswiping cars, or even jaywalking, they might have a point in making her remove her hijab, but she seems to have been a law abiding person for the most part. They were just making her because she didn't want to.

Would they make a Jewish man remove his Yarmulke in the same situation?
 
I'm totally with you on the modesty aspect. Which is why I generally don't do things that will get me arrested. I get uncomfortable if my Mom sees me in just a bra and panties, and I've known her for over 53 years now! But I do have to say that I find it odd that the rules have to change to accommodate what is essentially a criminal. But then you get the whole "innocent unless proven guilty" thing too. It's a mess. Part of me says just do what is "legal" where you live (on the part of police). Because they might make you take it off here, but what about the places where they make you put one on to take your mugshot? It's very complicated and boils down to keep your stuff legal and you won't have to worry about this crap!
I am down for stripping someone down to their birthday suit if they intentionally hurt someone but this was from a traffic ticket gone warrant. You are so right. It IS complicated. I totally agree.
 
I'm totally with you on the modesty aspect. Which is why I generally don't do things that will get me arrested. I get uncomfortable if my Mom sees me in just a bra and panties, and I've known her for over 53 years now! But I do have to say that I find it odd that the rules have to change to accommodate what is essentially a criminal. But then you get the whole "innocent unless proven guilty" thing too. It's a mess. Part of me says just do what is "legal" where you live (on the part of police). Because they might make you take it off here, but what about the places where they make you put one on to take your mugshot? It's very complicated and boils down to keep your stuff legal and you won't have to worry about this crap!
I'd also be uncomfortable, were my mother to see me in bra and panties, for at least two reasons which come immediately to mind:

1. She's dead

2. Doing the tranny tuck

};^D

Fuck the news of this kaka world. It's beer o'fuckingclock, Friday. Misery can wait a while for some company. Fuggit.
 
This might be simplistic, but I see it this way: When we lived overseas, we followed the laws and customs of that country. Mainly because not doing so would be detrimental to our well being, but also so as not to be rude to our host country, but ALSO to not embarrass our home country too. It is a dual language country, so I had no choice, I HAD to learn Afrikaans too (not starting at the beginning, but starting with where my class was by 7th grade, I had to go back and pick up the basics on my own, which they EXPECTED me to do). When we went to events/activities, we didn't have to sing their national anthem, but we damn sure had to show respect for it and stand while it was sung. To me, it's the same thing here. Follow the customs where you are, not for where you are from. I'm sure these Tennessee 'good ol' boys' were just doing what the rule book told them to do. I would doubt that they were doing it to terrorize her for funsies...
 
This might be simplistic, but I see it this way: When we lived overseas, we followed the laws and customs of that country. Mainly because not doing so would be detrimental to our well being, but also so as not to be rude to our host country, but ALSO to not embarrass our home country too. It is a dual language country, so I had no choice, I HAD to learn Afrikaans too (not starting at the beginning, but starting with where my class was by 7th grade, I had to go back and pick up the basics on my own, which they EXPECTED me to do). When we went to events/activities, we didn't have to sing their national anthem, but we damn sure had to show respect for it and stand while it was sung. To me, it's the same thing here. Follow the customs where you are, not for where you are from. I'm sure these Tennessee 'good ol' boys' were just doing what the rule book told them to do. I would doubt that they were doing it to terrorize her for funsies...


OK so, what customs should she have been following? There's no official religion in the United States.

Quite intentional. There's literally federal protections for freedom of religion, that's why she just cashed in.

And I say this as an atheist, but I can respect that this is the law and the custom where I'm from.
 
Last edited:
What's a mugshot for?
Identification.
How does she present herself to the outside world?
Wearing a hijab.
How should cops and L.E. identify it's her?
She'll be wearing a hijab.

It's elementary to figure out it wasn't done in the service of identification.


"I am sure all the men who fucked her to give her eight kids have seen her without her hijab"

Surprise, surprise, OP uses a sexual slur against a woman simply because of her faith.
You have absolutely no justification for slandering her in print by saying she's had multiple partners, as if you know that to be true, @Sugar Cookie.

I'm going to encourage everyone to use the report option when you see hate speech like the OPs here. Ultimately, DD is an entity that wants to attract traffic that stays past reading one of OPs hate-filled threads.
Very few people are staying once they've had a look at that shit.
Around 95% less.
 
Last edited:
I am sure all the men who fucked her to give her eight kids have seen her without her hijab.
I was really disappointed to read that sentence.
That's kinda how it works. The husband (man {most likely NOT 'men'} they fuck) get to see their hair.
You can still see all distinguishing features with the hijab. I'm glad this woman stood up for herself. Sometimes bigots only pay attention when money is lost.
 
I am sure all the men who fucked her to give her eight kids have seen her without her hijab.
As I am sure all your sexual partners have seen private parts of yourself. What's your point? She wears hijab as part of her identity so taking it off would make her more unrecognizable. If a nun were arrested and booked would it be okay to have her remove her habit? Or a chemotherapy patient, should they remove their wig? After all, the wig is not part of their person.

We're talking about a traffic violation, not a violent offender.
 
This might be simplistic, but I see it this way: When we lived overseas, we followed the laws and customs of that country. Mainly because not doing so would be detrimental to our well being, but also so as not to be rude to our host country, but ALSO to not embarrass our home country too. It is a dual language country, so I had no choice, I HAD to learn Afrikaans too (not starting at the beginning, but starting with where my class was by 7th grade, I had to go back and pick up the basics on my own, which they EXPECTED me to do). When we went to events/activities, we didn't have to sing their national anthem, but we damn sure had to show respect for it and stand while it was sung. To me, it's the same thing here. Follow the customs where you are, not for where you are from. I'm sure these Tennessee 'good ol' boys' were just doing what the rule book told them to do. I would doubt that they were doing it to terrorize her for funsies...
I didn't read that she wasn't born and raised here in America. And it says she was a citizen so she lives in America Home of the Free. *insert tough eagle pic I totally get what you mean though. When in Rome.... I doubt they had ill intent either in the beginning but I imagine she was very distressed at the thought. Someone should have done the right thing and said something like "Heyyy, this might cost us some money later. Why don't we go ask boss if we should leave it on. She's crying and talking about God and stuff."
 
Last edited:
I didn't read that she wasn't born and raised here in America. And it says she was a citizen so she lives in America Home of the Free. *insert tough eagle pic I totally get what you mean though. When in Rome.... I doubt they had ill intent either in the beginning but I imagine she was very distressed at the thought. Someone should have done the right thing and said something like "Heyyy, this might cost us some money later. Why don't we go ask boss if we should leave it on. She's crying and talking about God and stuff."
Fair points. But that kind of makes my point a little bit stronger. If she's an American, then she KNEW the possibility existed. I'm not coming down on one side or the other regarding the mugshot, both sides have a point IMO. A hijab is a unique article of clothing. It hides a lot that can change the appearance of a person if they decided freedom is more important than religious adherence. It hides completely a woman's hairline for instance. It hides things like moles, ears, how you look if your hair is up or down, which might sound drastic, but if I wear a ponytail at the nape of my neck I look 100% different than I do if I wear my normal cheerleader type high pony. Some people like to assert that if anything is done, then it's RAYSIS, or intending to harm, when the reality is as far from their bullshit suppositions as we currently are from the lunar surface. I see both sides very clearly. I happen to fall on the side that says sometimes prudence is required and that might make people uncomfortable.... ;)
 
Last edited:
I didn't read that she wasn't born and raised here in America. And it says she was a citizen so she lives in America Home of the Free. *insert tough eagle pic I totally get what you mean though. When in Rome.... I doubt they had ill intent either in the beginning but I imagine she was very distressed at the thought. Someone should have done the right thing and said something like "Heyyy, this might cost us some money later. Why don't we go ask boss if we should leave it on. She's crying and talking about God and stuff."
You definitely meant well.
 
I'm going to encourage everyone to use the report option when you see hate speech like the OPs here. Ultimately, DD is an entity that wants to attract traffic that stays past reading one of OPs hate-filled threads.
Very few people are staying once they've had a look at that shit.
Around 95% less.
When did this place become solely about YOU? The place was founded in irreverence and mocking of the criminally stupid. It's YOUR feelings and emotive screeds all over the damn place that has made it intolerable. OP is allowed to have her own opinions on the matter. Get over yourself, 'K? :finger:
 
@BuffettGirl

She is just sad that she has no newbies to write bullshit late night messages to.

Everyone here knows about those messages and talks shit about them.

After defending two proven racists on the site gives her no moral authority to tell anyone anything.

I just enjoy the two times (that I know about) she was told her presence on this site did not matter.
 
Does it matter? Nuns can have entire lives of marriage and children before taking their vows. Who care how many children she has if she makes sure they cared for. Are you mad at this woman because she's had a lot of kids? Are you mad at her that she's had a lot of sex? For what it's worth Islam is very pro-sex within marriage.
Doesn't bother me one way or another. Why can someone ask a what if question and I can't?
 
Doesn't bother me one way or another. Why can someone ask a what if question and I can't?
Alright, let's do this mental exercise. Say it was a Nun that had a former life of eight kids, multiple husbands and divorced multiple times. She decides to turn a new leaf and become Catholic and decides to dedicate her life to the Church. She's driving the church van and gets pulled over and realzies her license is suspended. Is removing her habit necessary for the booking photo? Or let's say it a chemo patient with a wig. Said person has a lot of kids, lots of sexual partners and whatever arbitrary thing that makes it "ok" to expose her. Should they removed the wig? Arguably it's more of a disguise.

Regardless, the federal law agrees with the person in the original article.
 
Alright, let's do this mental exercise. Say it was a Nun that had a former life of eight kids, multiple husbands and divorced multiple times. She decides to turn a new leaf and become Catholic and decides to dedicate her life to the Church. She's driving the church van and gets pulled over and realzies her license is suspended. Is removing her habit necessary for the booking photo? Or let's say it a chemo patient with a wig. Said person has a lot of kids, lots of sexual partners and whatever arbitrary thing that makes it "ok" to expose her. Should they removed the wig? Arguably it's more of a disguise.

Regardless, the federal law agrees with the person in the original article.
I think the nun got the most exercise in this scenario. The garments end up being a sweat band, but that doesn't matter and they shouldn't have to remove them.
 
@BuffettGirl

She is just sad that she has no newbies to write bullshit late night messages to.

Everyone here knows about those messages and talks shit about them.

After defending two proven racists on the site gives her no moral authority to tell anyone anything.

I just enjoy the two times (that I know about) she was told her presence on this site did not matter.
I'm one of those "proven racists." Each time, I only clapped back after you said something personally offensive to me. Shall I publish our private conversations? I think you expect too much from a basically free site. Please, do find where I was rude without provocation. Now, while the opinion of you is meaningless to me, you misjudging my expensive doc or making fun of my miscarriage matters. You knew damn well it would. Ohhhh, the unfairness. Please, do run over to the black forums and complain, that is borderline sexual satisfaction to me.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top