• You must be logged in to see or use the Shoutbox. Besides, if you haven't registered, you really should. It's quick and it will make your life a little better. Trust me. So just register and make yourself at home with like-minded individuals who share either your morbid curiousity or sense of gallows humor.

Sugar Cookie

Veteran Member
Bold Member!
St. Paul police are investigating the death of a 26-year-old man who they believe may have bled out after injuring himself punching through a window.

Police were called shortly after midnight on Saturday in the city’s Frogtown Neighborhood on a report of a domestic assault.

The victim, a woman, told dispatchers that she had been assaulted by her boyfriend who was armed with a handgun.

The woman had broken free from the boyfriend and had run to a neighbor’s house to call for help. The woman said the boyfriend had followed and was trying to break into the neighbor’s house.

When police arrived, the boyfriend was gone. The woman stated that he was angry with her about a phone call and had accused her of lying to him. She said he had pinned her down, choked her and put a gun to her head.

By the time officers arrived, the boyfriend was no longer there, but a large pool of blood was found in front of the house and one of the porch windows had been broken out.

The man had crashed his car into a parked vehicle and was found dead inside the car. Investigators believe he severed an artery when he broke the glass window and died from loss of blood.
1618713556939.webp
 
You see, what he did was a huge mistake, and a huge series thereof.

What he should have done is lumber upon her front yard, hoist a boombox* above his head, and play a favorite song of hers. That is how Nice Guys™ stalk women; not by smashing windows and parked cars and dying of blood loss like some betaworm who pretends to be alpha. That's just way too forward.

What a pathetic legacy this guy has left behind.

*Or whatever he has that can play and amplify music. Boomboxes are not a household accessory for the present day.
 
Last edited:
You see, what he did was a huge mistake, and a huge series thereof.

What he should have done is lumber upon her front yard, hoist a boombox* above his head, and play a favorite song of hers. That is how Nice Guys™ stalk women; not by smashing windows and parked cars and dying of blood loss like some betaworm who pretends to be alpha. That's just way too forward.

What a pathetic legacy this guy has left behind.

*Or whatever he has that can play and amplify music. Boomboxes are not a household accessory for the present day.
Damn you. Now i have "In Your Eyes" stuck in my head
 
You see, what he did was a huge mistake, and a huge series thereof.

What he should have done is lumber upon her front yard, hoist a boombox* above his head, and play a favorite song of hers. That is how Nice Guys™ stalk women; not by smashing windows and parked cars and dying of blood loss like some betaworm who pretends to be alpha. That's just way too forward.

What a pathetic legacy this guy has left behind.

*Or whatever he has that can play and amplify music. Boomboxes are not a household accessory for the present day.
Nice guys don't stalk women or use incel smoke signals, bro.
 
Nice guys don't stalk women or use incel smoke signals, bro.

Exactly. I don't know what thought processes motivated your response, or if it was meant to be criticizing, jesting, or a mix of both, but I overall can discern your objective point, even if I have degrees of nuanced uncertainty thereabout. (i.e. not sure what you mean by "smoke signals", but I am of the impression that your context of the term is parallel to that of the political use of "dog whistles".)

You may already know most or all of this, Ramona, and that is fine; I may be reading too much into your 11-word response, but, as the hyper-analyzer I am, I take this risk with a lot of the communications people parlay to me. I hope this post helps anyone seeking the information, or hoping to articulate what they may already know but can't articulate yet. Feel free to agree or disagree with my following material, or to correct/contrast me, or to dismiss altogether, but I have a few thoughts (not just for @Ramona the brave's perception, either):

Symmachus Says:
(essay #3,618,415)

My previous comment is facetious, but perhaps had dry prose. I know stalking is a very awful facet of human existence and interaction; this will not be a personal post, but I am thinking about several people in my life who utilized such a school of liberties against me, and I do not want it to happen to anyone. (albeit, not quite as severe as what today's suspect did on his metaphoric deathbed of debauched misogyny).

I know that there are "nice guys" who use such a facade to coerce and control women, and that is what I was addressing. A Nice Guy™ acts nice and pleasant superficially, but does not meaningfully equip themselves to care about others, particularly other women. I don't have a problem with men who are not archetypically masculine. (I am one myself; I am not an alpha-male and I am 100% okay with that. It's who I am.) I have a problem with any man, macho or timid, brutish or passive, who is a stalker or otherwise predator; or any man who analyze their own troubles in life and incessantly and/or primarily blame all or large swaths of women for such; or any man who fakes a persona to woo a woman, only to unleash an ungodly being upon them once it is too late.

So, "betaworm" was a crude term, and I will likely not be using the word in the future; but it is not meant to attack all non-masculine men, instead criticizing men who are overly emotionally dependent on how women may respond to or perceive them, and may be violent, petulant, or selfishly angry amidst undesired results. Bottom line: they let their insecurity around women get the better of them, and let their insecurity control their actions, instead of vice verse.

Some men are confidently passive, agreeable, emotionally glib, indistinct, and have more brain than brawn; some are pusillanimous, unconfident, depressed, socially maladjusted, weak, and are in non-ideal positions in life; these aspects are simply of human nature, and these groups of traits may overlap in the same people, and are traits not exclusive to beta males, or even males generally. An incel, however, weaponizes aforementioned negative self-dispositions against women, and blames women and female rejection for such problems, perhaps as the root.

And they think they're such tough guys for doing so.




(My use of the ™ symbol is completely independent of theirs.)

PS: Women do not owe these men anything, and women's safety is more important than male confidence. Female rejection can really suck sometimes, but life moves on... at least usually.
 
Last edited:
You see, what he did was a huge mistake, and a huge series thereof.

What he should have done is lumber upon her front yard, hoist a boombox* above his head, and play a favorite song of hers. That is how Nice Guys™ stalk women; not by smashing windows and parked cars and dying of blood loss like some betaworm who pretends to be alpha. That's just way too forward.

What a pathetic legacy this guy has left behind.

*Or whatever he has that can play and amplify music. Boomboxes are not a household accessory for the present day.
Play a Peter Gabriel song. Girls love that type of music.

*stands outside her window with Shock The Monkey blaring on boom box.
 
Back
Top