• You must be logged in to see or use the Shoutbox. Besides, if you haven't registered, you really should. It's quick and it will make your life a little better. Trust me. So just register and make yourself at home with like-minded individuals who share either your morbid curiousity or sense of gallows humor.
There's a case up before the dockets that they want Kavanaugh to be able to have a SCOTUS decision about; I'm sorry I don't recall the case name ATM, but it involves allowing a broad expansion of POTUS powers of pardoning to include state felonies, which has always been impossible under the constitution and in legal precedent. That, combined with Kavanaugh's current stance that the POTUS can't be charged/face trial in criminal or civil courts while in office, and can not be impeached - even though he was on Ken Starr's Special Prosecutor team and had some very intense and extreme questions regarding Clinton's sexuality/practices he wanted asked, and was quite proud that he helped Clinton's senate impeachment -IMO, these are the only reasons they insist on pushing Kavanaugh through the nomination process as quickly as possible, before the midterms.
Clinton faced civil charges during his office tenure, so again, legal precedent contradicts all of Kavanaugh's current stances.

A Supreme Court Case Could Liberate Trump to Pardon His Associates
Gamble v. United States isn’t related to the Russia investigation. But the outcome—which one senior Republican senator has tried to influence—could still have consequences for the probe.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/09/trump-pardon-orrin-hatch-supreme-court/571285/

Within the context of the Mueller probe, legal observers have seen the dual-sovereignty doctrine as a check on President Donald Trump’s power: It could discourage him from trying to shut down the Mueller investigation or pardon anyone caught up in the probe, because the pardon wouldn’t be applied to state charges. Under settled law, if Trump were to pardon his former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, for example—he was convicted last month in federal court on eight counts of tax and bank fraud—both New York and Virginia state prosecutors could still charge him for any crimes that violated their respective laws. (Both states have a double-jeopardy law that bars secondary state prosecutions for committing “the same act,” but there are important exceptions, as the Fordham University School of Law professor Jed Shugerman has noted.) If the dual-sovereignty doctrine were tossed, as Hatch wants, then Trump’s pardon could theoretically protect Manafort from state action.
 
I wonder what will happen if the FBI says it can corroborate Dr. Fords claim or cast further doubt on Kavanaugh.
Will American tear itself up?
Will the GOP do anything?
Is Kavanaigh the last Republican right wing judge left in America and is that why he is being clung to so hard?

Why is it so tough to find a person to put on SCOTUS that is not riddled with character flaws?
Can Republicans and Democrats get past all the political BS and get back to the basics of trying to build a better future for Americans?

It is fascinating as a Canadian watching the rewriting of history and utter hypocrisy involved in making a judge.
Why must politicians lie to try to make a weak incorrect argument stick.
At some point it is strength to admit the other side is right.
Arguing and lying to win a fight is dishonourable and cowardly.
These next few days and weeks will define what America will survive.
 
I wonder what will happen if the FBI says it can corroborate Dr. Fords claim or cast further doubt on Kavanaugh.
Will American tear itself up?
Will the GOP do anything?
Is Kavanaigh the last Republican right wing judge left in America and is that why he is being clung to so hard?

Why is it so tough to find a person to put on SCOTUS that is not riddled with character flaws?
Can Republicans and Democrats get past all the political BS and get back to the basics of trying to build a better future for Americans?

It is fascinating as a Canadian watching the rewriting of history and utter hypocrisy involved in making a judge.
Why must politicians lie to try to make a weak incorrect argument stick.
At some point it is strength to admit the other side is right.
Arguing and lying to win a fight is dishonourable and cowardly.
These next few days and weeks will define what America will survive.

Can we not find another right wing judge ... why is it so tough to find a SCOTUS that is not riddled with Character flaws?

For one his record is impeccable, for another should his career be derailed because of a character assassination, that occurred by and through what appears to be a false rape allegation.

The left expected him to withdraw ... he said in his opening statement that he would never quit ... that they might beat him in votes, but he wasn't leaving because of a smear campaign. So, even if there is another nominee ... everyone has to wait until this process is over.
 
Why state it like all survivors experience shame? I certainly didn't. Because I knew that it wasn't about me. At eight I had that figured out. Am I not allowed to ponder that? Why would I have given that kind of power over to someone else, and why aren't I allowed to question why someone else did? Speaking in absolutes isn't helping this situation. It's muddying the waters.

Why Buffetgirl, you can ponder any ole thing that you want. Has anyone here not allowed you to question? I think you need to give your eight year old self a great big ol' hug, honey.

By the way bg, I wasn't speaking in absolutes but what studies have borne out. You all butt hurt that they didn't call you in to get your opinion?
 
Why Buffetgirl, you can ponder any ole thing that you want. Has anyone here not allowed you to question? I think you need to give your eight year old self a great big ol' hug, honey.

By the way bg, I wasn't speaking in absolutes but what studies have borne out. You all butt hurt that they didn't call you in to get your opinion?

Well here's my opinion ... Stop assuming that every woman thinks like you, deals with sexual assault the same way ... or that every woman is some how less of a woman because they do not support the democrats ... or that they were not persuaded by CBF performance.

I'm going back to Ghomeshi --- multiple accusers ... and found not guilty in court!

CBF ... comes across as mentally unstable and if this is a false accusation ... then that would be exactly what she is, not to mention pretty much a criminal. And she came across as weak and pathetic ... and not so much the hero militant feminists would like most rational minded women to see.


**** those women in the elevator with the senator ... I hope your mothers were watching, and that that performance hurt them a little.

Girl ... I was sexually assaulted, I didn't tell anyone ... no one believed me !!!!

Me: Um ... er ... well which is it ? You didn't tell anyone .. or you told everyone ... but no one believed you ?

Like both could be true ... but not at the same time.
 
Well here's my opinion ... Stop assuming that every woman thinks like you, deals with sexual assault the same way ... or that every woman is some how less of a woman because they do not support the democrats ... or that they were not persuaded by CBF performance.

I'm going back to Ghomeshi --- multiple accusers ... and found not guilty in court!

CBF ... comes across as mentally unstable and if this is a false accusation ... then that would be exactly what she is, not to mention pretty much a criminal. And she came across as weak and pathetic ... and not so much the hero militant feminists would like most rational minded women to see.


**** those women in the elevator with the senator ... I hope your mothers were watching, and that that performance hurt them a little.

Girl ... I was sexually assaulted, I didn't tell anyone ... no one believed me !!!!

Me: Um ... er ... well which is it ? You didn't tell anyone .. or you told everyone ... but no one believed you ?

Like both could be true ... but not at the same time.
You go girl, hit that nail on the head
KABOOM!!:hilarious::hilarious::hilarious:
 
Is that Matt "I knew all about Weinstein" Damon? More liberal hypocrisy. Notice how absolutely no one is saying that they believe Kavanaugh is a rapist anymore? Suddenly that's not the issue, it's the fact that he was righteously pissed at the total injustice of the situation. I mean who wants a Supreme Court justice who gets angry about injustice and the total disregard for due process, right?

The Dems and turncoat Flake get their investigation. So how many Dems who were howling for "the truth" are going to vote to confirm once the FBI says that they have no additional information to report? None. Unless one of those who were staring at the floor when Graham called them all out, finally develop some sense of decency.

If any of them really cared about women, they'd be calling for an investigation into Feinstein, Avanatti and the rest of them. That woman didn't even know that she could have been heard in a private hearing. They never told her about that option, the lawyers that were supposed to be representing her - all because their only goal was to get that public hearing. That's after they exposed her against her wishes. Scum. But CNN isn't focusing on that part, so libs who read the daily leftist talking points and parrot them, well, they don't get upset.

Or they know and don't care.

Looks like Auntie Maxie has has been doxxing republicans. But that's ok too, all for the greater good, the ends justify the means.

The left can't compete on ideas or results and as their desperation increases their BS becomes more obvious. No Republicans are going to be swayed by more of the liberal lies and identity politics, but moderate lefties will see this affair for the sham that it is. They'll be disgusted.

The question remains - Will the Dems have the gall to roll out another ludicrously false allegation in the next week and demand even more nonsensical delays? Let me know if you're taking money on it. I have $100 that says they know they already went too far.
 
Last edited:
https://www.gofundme.com/support-brett-kavanaugh
:greedy::greedy::greedy::greedy:

Holy crap. There is a go fundme page for him too. As far as I can tell from reading all the updates, some random dude started it and he is suggesting if BK and his family dint want or need the money then they can donate to the charity of their choosing.

I have a good idea, gofundyourself:finger:


Thanks for that, I just sent him a 50. Which is more like 40 Greenbux. That 'random' guy you mentioned is John Hawkins.

https://rightwingnews.com/about/

Kavanaugh is an honorable man, there is no way he will accept that money (unlike some). It'll go to his church or some shit in the end, I don't care.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for that, I just sent him a 50. Which is more like 40 Greenbux. That 'random' guy you mentioned is John Hawkins.

https://rightwingnews.com/about/

Kavanaugh is an honorable man, there is no way he will accept that money (unlike some). It'll go to his church or some shit in the end, I don't care.
The only reason I referred to him as random dude is he hasn't spoken to anyone on BK's camp that has given any indication the go fund me page was needed or wanted.

I guess someone some where will benefit.
 
Last edited:
I didn't get a chance to watch the whole proceeding. But I'm having a lot of fun watching yt clips.

The hysteria is hilarious.
 
I didn't get a chance to watch the whole proceeding. But I'm having a lot of fun watching yt clips.

The hysteria is hilarious.


If you are undecided, watch the entire proceeding, then watch that clip. Then tell me CNN isn't a propaganda organisation. It's not surprising that CNN is collapsing, it's just surprising that there are still people who can't see their blatant lies.
 
Last edited:
USMCA ... its new ... but me saying USA - Mexico - Canada are all going to friends, is kind of last year and me saying I told you so ... is right now.
 
USMCA ... its new ... but me saying USA - Mexico - Canada are all going to friends, is kind of last year and me saying I told you so ... is right now.

I just... can't.... take all... the... winning... There's just too much of the USA not acting like economic bitches.... can't take much more.

But reducing trade deficits has to be racist and sexist and bigoted against muslims and blacks and gays and everyone else except privileged white men somehow, right?
 
Last edited:
Donald Trump: As projected in the FY 2019 budget, Trump plans to add $8.282 trillion, a 41-percent increase from the $20.245 trillion debt at the end of Obama's last budget for FY 2017. He will add almost as much in four years as Obama did in eight. That would also make him the second-biggest contributor to the debt in history in just one term.

@DIAFplease ... watch him have nothing but surpluses in 2020 and beyond.
 
We drank beer... we drank a lot of beer... I like beer... I drank a lot of beer... too much beer... I still drink beer... I really like beer... American beer

Well if there were moments during his testimony before the Senate where Brett Kavanaugh had real clarity it was all about the beer.
 
I see I have been remiss in my duty of spreading the truth. This shames me. But if it is any consolation to you, DD, teh Internetz needed me elsewhere.

Behold, the scandal of the century, as first reported by ABC:

B1E1B4C8-F478-44C7-B3A2-CCE9D8AE2625.webp


My only hope is that Creepy Porn Lawyer will be bold enough to help us bring this latest Crazed Sex Poodle from the Democratic party to justice. (Unfortunately, he’s been busy encouraging women to doxx guys on Twitter.)

Also, in other news:

A3C2291F-253B-48E0-BBC0-438C21DCC82C.webp



C8986306-F300-44B9-BD4A-DE8FBDDED53C.webp


245B7D0F-6F9D-4088-847D-9262488A6227.webp
 
We drank beer... we drank a lot of beer... I like beer... I drank a lot of beer... too much beer... I still drink beer... I really like beer... American beer

Well if there were moments during his testimony before the Senate where Brett Kavanaugh had real clarity it was all about the beer.

So what he liked beer in high school, college and still and he isn't apologetic about it ... Why should he be ?
Blacking out and passing out are not the same thing, and he's hardly the raging alcoholic you want him to be in high school, college or even now. He was into sports ... kept up his grades, maintained friendships and family ties, worked, went to church ...and in between all of those things he drank. Just like he does now ... when he's not being a judge, a coach ... mentor ... teacher ... he has a beer. WHOOP-dee DOOOOO!
 
Well, which is it? Is she mentally ill or is she some rich white lady who overcame her not so terrible experience to become richer and whiter? You can't have it both ways, though, by God, you do try.

Who are you talking to ? Are you implying that white people that have money can't become mentally ill or recover from it ?

Its sounds like that is what you're trying to suggest ... BADLY, but trying all the same.
 
So does this mean that after the FBI clears Kavanaugh for the 7th time, you will all except the fact that he is not a rapist?

I sure as hell won't (yes, I know you weren't asking me personally). Nor do I believe a person with his unstable, injudicial personality belongs on the Supreme Court. However, he is most likely to be seated on that court in short order after the limited FBI inquiry. Republicans don't want to risk losing seats during the midterms and losing the ability to shove this person down our throats.
 
the limited FBI inquiry. Republicans don't want to risk losing seats during the midterms and losing the ability to shove this person down our throats.


Democrats don't want anyone in the seat at all ... that's worse for the American people than an empty seat.
 
I see I have been remiss in my duty of spreading the truth. This shames me. But if it is any consolation to you, DD, teh Internetz needed me elsewhere.

Behold, the scandal of the century, as first reported by ABC:

View attachment 8540

Do you have a link to this tweet? I checked ABC's twitter and it isn't there. The URL redirects to an article about the trial, no mention of Cory Booker
 
Edit to remove @lithiumgirl quote. Not sure how it got in there.

Well, which is it? Is she mentally ill or is she some rich white lady who overcame her not so terrible experience to become richer and whiter? You can't have it both ways, though, by God, you do try.
Rich people no matter what gender or color can have mental illness. It's not just for poor folk.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top