• You must be logged in to see or use the Shoutbox. Besides, if you haven't registered, you really should. It's quick and it will make your life a little better. Trust me. So just register and make yourself at home with like-minded individuals who share either your morbid curiousity or sense of gallows humor.

Turd Fergusen

Veteran Member
jersey-troopers-child-porn-1.jpg

A female New Jersey state trooper has been busted for allegedly receiving images of naked children during a sexually explicit text exchange with a fellow trooper — and not reporting the child porn, officials said.

Andrea Knox, 35, who is assigned to the agency’s Moorestown station, was arrested Tuesday on charges of second-degree official misconduct and third-degree possession of child porn, according to the state Attorney General’s Office.

She exchanged messages with Trooper Jeffrey Reitz, 48, who was indicted in December on two counts of possession of child porn involving a separate exchange of texts with another woman in 2014, according to a statement.

Reitz was arrested again Tuesday and charged with distribution of child pornography.

“During those exchanges, the woman proposed that Reitz sexually assault a young girl and sent him a sexually explicit photo of the girl,” the AG’s Office said. The girl has been described as that woman’s 5-year-old daughter.

Reitz allegedly responded to the image by texting “NICE!” — and made a reference to sexual arousal, according to the Courier Post.

The sick exchange from 2014 was unearthed during a probe of the woman, who is serving a seven-year prison sentence for allowing a child to engage in porn, the Philadelphia Inquirer reported.

Full Story:
https://nypost.com/2020/02/26/2-new-jersey-state-troopers-face-child-porn-charges-for-explicit-texts/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
“During those exchanges, the woman proposed that Reitz sexually assault a young girl and sent him a sexually explicit photo of the girl,” the AG’s Office said. The girl has been described as that woman’s 5-year-old daughter.

Do you know what I don't get? Why aren't there a bunch of stories where somebody gets busted for kiddie porn because they texted a prospective S.O., who then proceeded to nope out all the way to the cops?

We're always seeing these stories where the sickos throw their deviancy out there and their date goes right along with it. What, do they have some sort of radar?
 
Do you know what I don't get? Why aren't there a bunch of stories where somebody gets busted for kiddie porn because they texted a prospective S.O., who then proceeded to nope out all the way to the cops?

We're always seeing these stories where the sickos throw their deviancy out there and their date goes right along with it. What, do they have some sort of radar?


This is a good point. They must be giving off some kind of sign.
 
Do you know what I don't get? Why aren't there a bunch of stories where somebody gets busted for kiddie porn because they texted a prospective S.O., who then proceeded to nope out all the way to the cops?

We're always seeing these stories where the sickos throw their deviancy out there and their date goes right along with it. What, do they have some sort of radar?
Perv-dar? That's not good enough. Some of us are perverts that 'keep it legal'.
Fuckedupasshole-dar? maybe too long.
 
Weird

Wonder what the details of this one were with the female cop. We know the 2014 case involved a woman actively involved in trafficking her kid, but they dont give any details on the cop. Was she also a creep or was she just some dumb bimbo that this pervo decided to test his sick kinks out on, sent her some shit to gauge her interest to see if he had found another source? The charges make it seem like the latter, that she simply recieved the footage/didnt report it.
 
Do you know what I don't get? Why aren't there a bunch of stories where somebody gets busted for kiddie porn because they texted a prospective S.O., who then proceeded to nope out all the way to the cops?
We're always seeing these stories where the sickos throw their deviancy out there and their date goes right along with it. What, do they have some sort of radar?

I often wonder the same thing. I figure it's like anything else. There are many legal deviant sexual fetishes and those people seem to find each other.

In the Victoria Martens case the mom said she used to look for people that would want to be with her daughter. That she could "just tell". I'm sure normal people like us don't pick up on it.
 
Sounds like Andrea didn't report it, it actively involved.

Makes her just as complicit. She may have not provided or solicited the images, but she didn't do anything to discourage it. Reporting him would have been the right thing to do. She was into it - or she would have said something.

Probably got off on his texts.
 
Makes her just as complicit. She may have not provided or solicited the images, but she didn't do anything to discourage it. Reporting him would have been the right thing to do. She was into it - or she would have said something.

Probably got off on his texts.
Oh, I'm not saying she isn't guilty or a stupid bitch. Just saw the article about why they only gave her those charges.

I agree she is just as complicit.
 
Sounds like Andrea didn't report it, it actively involved.
It appears she was a bit tantalized by the pics and steered the conversation a ways.
According to the statement, Knox asked Reitz for details about sex acts he’d like to perform on the child during a text exchange on Aug. 27, 2018.

“The following day, the pair had another sexually explicit text exchange, during which Reitz sent Knox photos of people at a nudist location,” the statement said.

The images included photos of two exposed girls, it said.

 
Back
Top