• You must be logged in to see or use the Shoutbox. Besides, if you haven't registered, you really should. It's quick and it will make your life a little better. Trust me. So just register and make yourself at home with like-minded individuals who share either your morbid curiousity or sense of gallows humor.

Turd Fergusen

Veteran Member
congress-stocks-09.webp

Nancy Pelosi is scrambling to quash bipartisan efforts to ban stock trading by Congressional lawmakers — even as she and her husband have raked in as much as $30 million from bets on the Big Tech firms Pelosi is responsible for regulating.

Late last month, the House Speaker disclosed that the Pelosis scooped up millions in bullish call options for stocks including Google, Salesforce, Micron Technology and Roblox. At the same, some insiders say she has slow-walked efforts to rein in Big Tech.

Days later, Pelosi brushed off worries over stock picking by lawmakers, claiming it was part of the “free-market economy” — comments that made Democratic insiders “blood boil,” people close to the speaker told The Post.

“Key policy makers can be rich but they shouldn’t own individual companies,” Jeff Hauser, a self-proclaimed progressive Democrat and founder and director of the Revolving Door Project, told The Post.

Stock picking by elected officials “gets worrisome about whether legislators have access to insider information or whether your stock purchases will consciously or unconsciously impact policy making,” Hauser added.

When asked whether the opportunity to profit on trades could create a conflict of interest, the speaker has flatly said “no” and has rejected the idea of a ban on trading individual stocks. Pelosi spokesman Drew Hammill did not dispute The Post’s findings that Paul Pelosi has generally outperformed the market but insisted that the trades are not an issue.

“The Speaker does not own any stocks,” Hammill told The Post. “As you can see from the required disclosures, with which the Speaker fully cooperates, these transactions are marked ‘SP’ for Spouse. The Speaker has no prior knowledge or subsequent involvement in any transactions.”

Walter Shaub, the former director of the United States Office of Government Ethics during both the Obama and Trump administrations, called this defense “absolutely insulting.”

“The idea that the stocks are in her husband’s name is a complete red herring,” Shaub told The Post. “Unless members of Congress are willing to wear microphones around the clock when they’re having dinner with their spouses and going to bed, the public has no way of knowing what information they intentionally or inadvertently shared.”

Full Article:
 
Twenty-some years ago I wrote my congresscritter to tell him she was crooked as a dog's hind leg and don't vote for her as speaker. T. Boone Pickens had a scheme to erect windmills across the country, but the pipeline du jour would bring in fuel and pop that plan just as surely as a straight pin pops an inflated balloon. And it turns out pelosi was heavily invested so she blocked every attempt to get the pipeline bill to the floor for a vote.

--Al
 
Her previous argument that lawmakers should have the same right to make moolah that regular Americans have is wrong.
Most investing Americans are prohibited from investing using insider trading.

Not one politician or their immediate family should have any stocks at all.
It smacks of greed and entitlement and only showcases their true reasons for pursuing office.
Politicians have forgotten they are elected to serve the citizenry and the Constitution.
 
Last edited:
Nancy Pelosi is scrambling to quash bipartisan efforts to ban stock trading by Congressional lawmakers — even as she and her husband have raked in as much as $30 million from bets on the Big Tech firms Pelosi is responsible for regulating.
Martha Stewart served time for trading stocks from inside information. Imagine having more than just information.... imagine having a say in regulating the stocks your hubby has invested in. F.U. Pelosi. Cheater cheater pumpkin eater. I'm going out on a limb here and calling this corruption. But what do I know?
 
Last edited:

Jon Ossoff expected to snub Pelosi by pushing ban on Congress stock trades​

Georgia Sen. Jon Ossoff is looking to introduce a bill that would ban members of Congress from trading individual stocks — a practice that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has defended as her husband rakes in millions of dollars trading shares of tech companies, The Post has learned.

The Ossoff ethics bill, which the Democratic freshman Senator plans to introduce once he finds a Republican co-sponsor, would crack down on conflicts of interest by making it illegal for lawmakers and their families to trade stocks while in office, a Washington, D.C. source close to the situation said.
 

Pelosi reverses course, signals openness to banning congressional stock trades​

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Thursday suggested that she will consider proposals banning members of Congress from trading stocks while in elective office, a sharp reversal from just a month ago when she adamantly defended the practice.

The about-face comes after weeks of pressure from Democrats and Republicans, with lawmakers on both sides of the political aisle introducing legislation that would prohibit, or limit, members of Congress and their spouses in some cases, from trading stocks while in office. The stock-ban bills have come from a number of lawmakers, including Sens. Jon Ossoff, D-Ga., Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., Josh Hawley, R-Miss., and Reps. Abigail Spanberger, D-Va., and Chip Roy, R-Texas.
 

Pelosi, other stock-trading pols could avoid capital gains taxes under Warren proposal​

Elizabeth Warren’s bipartisan bill banning stock trading on Capitol Hill has a little-noticed provision that could save lawmakers millions of dollars worth of capital gains taxes — and Nancy Pelosi is signaling she likes it.

On the face of it, the forthcoming Ban on Congressional Stock Ownership Act from Warren (D-Mass.) and Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.) would be the most stringent proposed crackdown on stock trading to date. It wouldn’t just ban members of Congress and their spouses from trading stocks and require them to put their assets in a blind trust — like another popular Democratic proposal. It also would require them to sell off all their individual stock holdings altogether, sources familiar with the bill told The Post.

Nevertheless, according to a less-noticed provision in the bill, lawmakers who convert their stocks would also receive a massive sweetener: They would be able convert their stocks into broad-based investment funds or Treasury bonds while deferring any capital gains taxes until they sell off the new assets — and if they die before selling the assets, the taxes would be waived altogether.

The tax savings from the bill for members of Congress could even potentially outweigh any profits they would have made from trading individual stock, according to tax analyst and Columbia Business School professor Robert Willens — giving backers the dual advantage of looking virtuous while also making money.
 

Dem Abigail Spanberger slams Pelosi for ‘failure of leadership’ as stock trade ban stalls​

Rep. Abigail Spanberger lashed out at House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and called for new party leadership on Capitol Hill Friday as a bill Spanberger sponsored that would ban lawmakers from trading stock while in office languished in Congress.

Spanberger (D-Va.), who is facing a close re-election fight in the Nov. 8 midterms, issued the scathing statement as it became clear that the TRUST in Congress Act would not come up for a vote until after Election Day.
 
Back
Top