• You must be logged in to see or use the Shoutbox. Besides, if you haven't registered, you really should. It's quick and it will make your life a little better. Trust me. So just register and make yourself at home with like-minded individuals who share either your morbid curiousity or sense of gallows humor.

Sugar Cookie

Veteran Member
Bold Member!
1758250764688.webp


Ball State University has terminated its director of health promotion and advocacy, following controversial comments she posted on Facebook about conservative activist Charlie Kirk.

A part of Suzanne Swierc’s social media post said, “Let me be clear: if you think Charlie Kirk was a wonderful person, we can’t be friends,” and added that “Charlie Kirk’s death is a reflection of the violence, fear and hatred he sowed.”
Ball State University released a statement explaining that Swierc’s post was inconsistent with her leadership role and caused significant disruption to the university.

“On September 10, 2025, Ms. Suzanne Swierc posted a statement on social media related to the assassination of Mr. Charlie Kirk. Our Administration determined the post was inconsistent with the distinctive nature and trust of Ms. Swierc’s leadership position at Ball State University and that the post caused significant disruption to the University.

“Consistent with recent case law in the Seventh Circuit, specifically, Hedgepeth v Britton, No. 24-1427 (7th Cir. 2025), our Administration evaluated the impact of the significant disruption to the University’s mission and operations and the effect of the post on her ability to perform her work in her leadership position.

“As a result of the review, our Administration terminated Ms. Swierc’s employment, effective immediately.

“No additional information will be released on this personnel matter.

“A separate post on a second employee’s personal account remains under investigation by our Administration. No additional information will be released on that post at this time.”

Ball State University, posted at 5:15 p.m. Sept. 17, 2025, on X
 
First off, she had extremely insensitive and false comments about Charlie Kirk's shooting. Did she even know anything about the man, or was she simply segueing into the comfortable "CONSERVATIVE MAN BAD" groupthink? I am absolutely happy to not be friends with someone like this woman who would have such a pitiful attitude toward a highly intelligent family man whom she doesn't agree with politically and/or religiously. She clearly is blaming this man for his own assassination, which is so tone-deaf and disgustingly rank.

Secondly, what the heck was this woman doing being employed as a "Director of Health Promotion and Advocacy" position, when she is very plainly so out of shape? Who is she, with that excessive double chin, to advise others on how to be healthy? What even does that job title mean, and what do the job duties entail? I'm not pointing out her chin to be mean or give a low-blow insult; but when I see someone who looks like her, I will absolutely never think of them as healthy. So, when her employers at Ball State interviewed her, what made them think she was a qualified person for this? What did she say, and what experience did she show, that won them over? And while she was employed as the Health Promotion Director, how much fat-positivity rhetoric did she sneak in? I would bet my life savings that it wasn't none.

It is one thing for a gym teacher to have a slight belly, a "dad bod" if you will. That can just be natural aging combined with not keeping up as much physically as you get older. But this? She's not even that old yet but has a neck that is way easier to hit from 250 yards. (Which I obviously would not want to happen to her. I can't believe I need to specify that, but here we are these days.)

And on her last sentence of the preaching that got her fired, "Charlie Kirk excused the deaths of children in the name of the second amendment". What is that even supposed to mean? Can she cite any instance at all where Charlie Kirk told a parent something to the effect of, "I'm sorry your kid died, but preserving the second amendment is a higher priority for me."? I'm sure the most intelligent thing she could say if she was called out for this sentiment would be, "Well, um, you know, the school shooting situation in America is really bad right now, and there are conservatives who just think that the second amendment is more important than that. They're just not doing anything about it, and Charlie Kirk was part of that problem. And I, um, just think that, you know, with the things he said and stuff, the school shootings would continue because of that and I don't think it's going away." Swervy Swirec, where are your evidence and examples, if you have any?

In conclusion, Suzanne Swirec was unfit both physically and credentially for her position, deserved to be fired from it and perhaps not hired in the first place, and has a negative view of Kirk that is completely uninformed and unserious and based on fact-free strawmen mutatively derived from what Kirk actually believed. Prove me wrong.

iu


EDIT: I looked up Suzanne Swirec on Duckduckgo image search, and I found this! As the first result!

iu


iu
 
Last edited:
He/she's the last person I would suspect would be a "director of health promotion and advocacy". Stuffed pig-looking and all.

Aside from that though, I don't even know what the title of that slide is supposed to mean. I don't think I want to know.
 
Yeah I was looking at the legs, they look very masculine but the arms even more so. This person does have a very strange shape with fat being stored mainly in the neck, but the legs and arms are very muscular. Unless the woman is an intense body builder they don't usually have such muscular arms and legs.

But as usual this is just my opinion, I look like a mashed potato, so I really can't talk about being muscular, since I never have been.
 
Back
Top