• You must be logged in to see or use the Shoutbox. Besides, if you haven't registered, you really should. It's quick and it will make your life a little better. Trust me. So just register and make yourself at home with like-minded individuals who share either your morbid curiousity or sense of gallows humor.

Symmachus

Japanese band Boris is better than your band.
Bold Member!
iu


Radio icon Howard Stern said that last week’s Supreme Court ruling overturning Roe v. Wade makes it more likely that he’ll run for president in 2024.
Stern, a longtime supporter of abortion rights, said he would set out to accomplish just two things.

“The problem with most presidents is they have too big of an agenda,” he said on his SiriusXM radio show on Monday, according to The Hill. “The only agenda I would have is to make the country fair again.”
He called out Donald Trump’s three Supreme Court justices for lying about accepting legal precedent during their confirmation hearings.

“It’s very hard to have a Supreme Court that’s openly lied,” he said, adding that it “undermines everything.”
He said the three were put onto the court by Trump, who lost the popular vote in the 2016 election by nearly 3 million votes.

“A guy who lost the vote won the election,” he said. “How long can we keep electing people who lost the election?”
As a result, Stern vowed to end the Electoral College.
“I am going to do the very simple thing that’ll set the country straight: one vote, one person,” he said. “No more Electoral College. I’m getting rid of it.”
But he also vowed more immediate action to fix the Supreme Court.
“The other thing is, if I do run for president, and I’m not fucking around, I’m really thinking about it, because the only other thing I’m going to do is appoint five more Supreme Court justices,” Stern said.

I'm not going to give this news item one bias or the other, I just thought it was interesting. I wonder what political party he would run under.

I also wonder what Dwayne Johnson's current thoughts are on his political aspirations and whether his possible interest in the presidency has grown beyond public non-denial of such.

What are your thoughts?
 
We had Ronald Reagan. We had Donald Trump. Don't see much difference in Howard Stern running. It certainly isn't any more shocking or outlandish. Plus, he's actually extremely intelligent.
[automerge]1656401176[/automerge]
I do wonder how he plans to fulfill his agenda. I'd LOVE the electoral college gone, but it wouldn't be just his decision. I'd also love five new supreme court justices, but unless he assassinates five of the current ones during his term, that seems unlikely. Also, the current court is relatively young. Two are low 70's, three are in their 60's, the rest are in their 50's. Not a huge chance they will be dropping like flies soon.
 
Last edited:
“I am going to do the very simple thing that’ll set the country straight: one vote, one person,” he said. “No more Electoral College. I’m getting rid of it.”

I don't like this part. This means the biggest states like California, New York, Ohio and such would be who decides who the president would be. Smaller states like Rhode Island would have no real reason to vote.
 
I don't like this part. This means the biggest states like California, New York, Ohio and such would be who decides who the president would be. Smaller states like Rhode Island would have no real reason to vote.
Not correct. States don't elect anyone. States don't vote. Individual American people vote. It would mean that every single person who bothered to get off their butt and vote, that their vote counted. One person, one vote.
 
Not correct. States don't elect anyone. States don't vote. Individual American people vote. It would mean that every single person who bothered to get off their butt and vote, that their vote counted. One person, one vote.
At the moment, people vote for other people that will vote as they please. There are some exceptions, where they promise to vote for the candidate that won the popular vote in their state, but for the most part, they do not have to do so at all.

I like the system we have in Poland (and in other European countries). No one can become a president if he does not get at least 50% of the votes.

But on the other hand, we have terrible parliamentary elections when you do not vote for a person, you vote for a party and they decide how goes to house and senate.
 
Ugh he’s a skeez. A sleaze. A skeevy perv. He rescues animals which is nice but getting porn stars to queef into a microphone is not exactly political experience. What would his slogan be? Bababooey Bababooey Howard Stern’s penis?
 
Forgot to mention, he will definitely get a support from Pfizer and likes since he knows nothing and just repeat their propaganda. Even though he said before he would never be vaccinated because Trump said so.
New study from Germany came recently, saying 1 in 5000 people have severe adverse reactions to the vaccine. I'm one of them. I was forced by my flatmate to take it, even though I knew that back then that I have really low risk. And in Germany you're totally excluded from society if you're not vaccinated. I was fine after first two doses but after third one, there was not a single minute I didn't have a migrane (for the last 7 months). I'm getting by taking 50 paracetamol pills a day.

There was a really good info about adverse reactions vaccine may cause by Robert Koch Institute in German, but they deleted everything and pretend there never posted it at all. In my neurologist's waiting room, they hanged utter lies saying that 1 in 6 people with covid get hospitalized (the truth backed by many reaserch is 0.89% in total, more like 0.5 for people my age).

I got covid anyway after 3 doses and it was kinda severe case too.

So if you didn't get vaccinated yet and ask me-do not take it. Unless you're above 60 or obese.
 
Last edited:
They've finally admitted the shots do fuck-all and people who are fully vaxxed and boosted are getting infected and fully vaxxed people can also transmit the virus. So, tell me again why we have the mandates? Why do we have them in spite of so many serious complications and injuries?
 
They've finally admitted the shots do fuck-all and people who are fully vaxxed and boosted are getting infected and fully vaxxed people can also transmit the virus. So, tell me again why we have the mandates? Why do we have them in spite of so many serious complications and injuries?
Not only that, but in some countries, the majority of people dying from covid are actually FULLY VACCINATED. But they all scrap all the info from Google and even from Duckduck Go (which used to be moderately unbiased, although it's nothing more than Bing, owned by Microsoft in disguise, so they can be somehow resistant to censorship because so few people use it).

Good luck finding any reliable source about covid vaccines right now. Go to Google owned YouTube and search "brought to you by Pfizer" (same case as conservative owned Sinclair "it's a threat to our democracy"). The self appointed ultimate authority about vaccines, Bill Gates convincing Oxford to sell patent for the vaccine to Astra Zeneca, instead of making the formula available to any drug companies (for those not familiar about how generic VS patented medication work, original viagra costs 80$ per 100 mg pill and I've bought half kilograms of sildenafil powder for 200€, to make my plants grow better of course).
And no one watching regular mass media will know anything about it at all, as Satanica shared a video in different topic about "my body my choice" abortion vs forced vaccination (sorry for not linking, I'm on the mobile).

Face the truth-all the mass media is BOUGHT. Doesn't matter if it's fox, CNN or so called state owned BBC and in my case, tagesschau in Germany. They all have their own agenda consistent with the companies that sponsor them. Do you really think that Exon or BP pay millions of dollars for advertisements that almost no one ever sees (taking into consideration the actual amount of people that watches this bullshit).

I personally have to unsubscribe from CNN at least once per month on YouTube, even though I have never deliberately clicked on any of their videos. Because Susan Wójcicki decided at one point to make turn it from a platform "from people to people" to "corporations no one wants to hear from on TV and even less on demand to people".

I found out how it works myself really well, I'm huge fan of Jimmy Dore, you can check if you want, I won't convince anyone to do so, but I've seen seen every single video he has posted on YouTube in the last 7 years probably. And for almost two years, his subribers counter was all the time 900k.

I'm quite technically literate, so for even for me that can be explained with some system error or whatever. But when I've got unsubscribed around 20(!!!) times from his channel the same time and next 20 times subscribed to CNN that's more than a coincidence.
You have to ask yourself a question. Is it possible that no one cared about what he had to say and no one unsubscribed at the same time? Or are there influences from inside or outside of YouTube that do not want people like him to be heard and channels like CNN pushed as much as possible on you to hear? (I already laughed at CNN's prime time viewership of 600k and Tucker Carlson being the most popular among DEMOCRATS in key demo).

You have to ask yourself, who wants to watch CNN reporter confirming the alleged chlorine chemical attack in Syria, after sniffing a backpack, without mentioning she's a GRANDDAUGHTER of former prime Minister of Syria.

Go to Wikipedia, you'll see that one of the inventors of MRNA vaccine and you'll see they paint him as an anti vaxxer. I personally tried correct some bullshit they wrote about him with 100% verifiable information from pubmed (the most popular scientific research search engine, use Sci-Hub so you don't have to pay the hyenas at elsvier) and my ip got banned from editing (I also got banned from commenting on YouTube videos and channel 4 for some reason, so I had to make new account to watch Kitchen Nightmares xD)

To prop Jimmy Dore. He's not a scientist he never claimed to be one. But he is able to get guest like Malone, the co inventor of the MRNA vaccine or Peter McCollough the most cited doctor in history of peer reviewed literature, with over 600 articles considered to be thoroughly studied and reviewed about kidneys and heart and over 60 about covid (probably being the top number of articles about covid of any other scientists(. Here's an interview with the former

He explicitly says that there is NO WAY WE CAN VACCINATE the way out of the pandemic. Malone said the same thing. It will most likely become a phenomenon like a flu, being potentially dangerous to risk groups: obese or elderly people and being one of the hundreds similar ones to the rest of them population, especially with the omicorn variant (see this article from dailymail which is very well sourced for a tabloid website https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ays-pressured-making-variant-sound-worse.html , another interesting fact I was banned from r/nottheonion for posting the articles from them because their consider it tabloid journalism while allowing CNN and fox and all the other trash).

Sorry for such a avalanche of cringe, it's a topic that's really close to my heart, because I'm very interested in medicine (doesn't give me any authority to talk about it though, without a degree in medicine or farmacology, but if Bill Gates can say he's a pediatrician because he used anal probes on Eppstein's Island, who will say I'm not equally, if not more qualified xD)

And for people with too much free time as me, go to your country's respective statistics authority or whatever it's called and check the actual death statistics (I can only confirm the ones from Poland and Germany). You'll see that covid deaths are extremely inflated. Why? Because that's how hospitals make money. It's a little different for US where the insurers are mostly private as opposite to European public ones but the drill is the same. I'm not an expert about the German standard but in Poland when we had special hospitals made for covid patients specifically at stadiums, commerce centers, the average doctor earns 8 times more than the same kind of doctor in regular hospital. And around 62 times more than the minimal hourly wage for regular worker (and in Poland they comprise of not less than 50% of totall workers).

I'll probably add more to the topic when I recall something else.

EDIT : I just correct grammar/spelling errors
 
I want to give an example of how "woke" and "informed" person I consider myself to be was tricked by fox. YouTube suggested a lot of Jeanine Pirro's opening statements from her TV show without showing any additional content of these shows visable to me (because I'm from Poland, full episodes are actually region blocked and unaccessible without VPN). She makes some good points. She's very charismatic and tells a truth about some things you don't see on other networks. She seems to be well-read, intelligent, educated woman.

BUT.

Then I've seen The Jinx (TV series of liberal HBO about Robert Durst). And she has always said in these Fox's programs how she had a huge role in putting him in prison (I'll never learn the difference between jail and prison, I have to Google it every time I want to mention it xD). And after some investigation of my own, I learned she actually did nothing to bring him to justice. He was like her, rich, powerful with good connections. She was the prosecutor in one of the cases he was accused of (sorry for my English here, I don't know how to properly put this in words), she was quite hard on him, but in the end, she did nothing.
Let's check Amazon's description of her book

Former prosecutor Jeanine Pirro--the "true hero" (New York Post) of the hit HBO documentary series The Jinx--offers the transfixing true story of her tireless fifteen-year investigation into accused murderer Robert Durst for the disappearance of his wife Kathleen Durst.

What a fucking bullshit is it! From New York Post, allegedly on the opposite side than FOX.
If Robert Durst wouldn't have been Ryan Gosling's fan and wouldn't agree to star in the documentary made by the people who did the drama version of his first murder and would not be dumb enough to literally admit that "he killed them all" on hot mic, there would be no case at all.

She might have seem to me like someone to look up to at the time, but this case along with her blinded love for Trump as I've seen when he was the candidate/president spoke for themselves better than any of her opening statements I've seen in Youtube , written most likely by 20 Hollywood screenwriters who know exactly how to relate to people watching and pretend she is "on their side"
 
It's almost guaranteed that any celebrity you see on any newsy programs are following an agenda set forth by the network. Those who don't are getting cancelled by the left.
You're right. They would not be put in a place by multi billion dollar corporations if they did not serve their purpose.
They don't have to be good journalistsz heck, they don't have to be jourilists at all. They have dozens of people writing them scripts on what to say and their own contributions are nonexistent.

Check a documentary about Amy Schumer with a catchy name "elephant in the room" (I couldn't think of better name to describe her lol).
Or the discrepancy between critics and audience scores of "Late Night With Lily Singh", 85/100 for critics (used to be whopping 100/100) and 15/100 for audience score.

And as much as I consider myself a leftie, the cancel culture left is advocating for whenever they don't like something is horrendous.
It's not the way to go.

Am example : Alexandra Elbakyan the founder of Sci-Hub. She's most likely the most influential person in science history.. Why? Because she made scientific literature available to millions of people who would not to be able to read it otherwise. But she herself says she believes comminism to be the ideal political system and praises Stalin who is the greatest mass murder in history (actually killing most of his "own" people).

Should I hate her for that and just ignore all the good she did? No, and neither should you. If you have an encounter with her in some Kazakhstani desert, if you think she's wrong, you should talk to her ad convince her otherwise. But it should diminish her influence and achievements at all.
 
Another interesting footage. Kim Iversen talking to Peter McCullough ( the most cited doctor in history) about myocarditis among young men developing after covid vaccine. CDC went from saying it happens in 1 in few hundred thousands to 1 in 2500 after few months.

New study from Thailand says its 1 in 43 (really small sample group so take it with a pinch of salt).

How long before we will see articles in New York Times that it's a third world country and we should not believe anything they say like it was with enormous study of efficacy of Ivermectin in Brasil ( most do the regular people will probably read the bullshit fact check by Politi Fact, founded by among many others : Google, Microsoft, Meta, WhatsApp, Tiktok, Washington Post i 3(!!!) separate categories out of 4 possible).

Here's peer reviewed study (meaning scientifist other than the ones conducting the study agreed on) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35070575/


Here's politfact "debunking", supported by whopping one doctor from John Hopkins (taking millions yearly from big pharma) and one PhD STUDENT (can't make this stuff up) from some Australian university (but don't worry, it's his hobby is writing about covid so he cannot be wrong)

 
Found great website with uncensored vaccine statistics and information that anyone can easily verify.
Merge me
[automerge]1661533317[/automerge]
Shit I barely missed the 10 minutes window to edit my post, please merge me :P

I read really well sourced article about spontaneous abortions after receiving covid shot and wanted to find it (couldn't do so on Google and duck). But the first fucking result is a study where mere 3 out of 7 people were directly funded by Pfizer with one of them "Lipkind reported serving on the Pfizer independent external data monitoring committee for the COVID-19 vaccine."
Seems legit lol.


Out of 440 results for "covid abortions" in pubmed, the first result Google and duck give is the one from people on Pfizer payroll lol.

I just gave up searching because there is no decent search engine I know of.
The best alternative for anyone interested is
SearXNG and searx instances

It gives the results from Google and others and can proxy the results so you don't have to connect to neither the search engine nor the website itself.

Cons: they removed Yandex for obvious reasons,even though it has best image search.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top