Harvard Behavior Scientist Who Studied Honesty Accused of Fabricating Data

[Turd Fergusen]

A prominent Harvard behavioral scientist who undertook studies about honesty is under fire for allegedly fabricating papers that she worked on, according to a report.

Harvard Business School’s Francesca Gino chalked up phony results tied to studies, including one focused on honest behavior, the New York Times reported.

She’s been placed on leave, according to her business school web page, which the Times reported showed she was still on the job as recently as mid-May.

She has published 135 articles since 2007, according to the Chronicle for Higher Education.

In a blog, called DataColada, run by three behavioral scientists, it alleged fraud in four academic papers that Gino co-authored.

They said they presented evidence of fraud to Harvard in the fall of 2021 tied to a 2012 paper and another three papers she was a part of.

Full Article

Harvard behavior scientist who studied honesty accused of fabricating data: report

Prominent Harvard behavioral scientist Francesca Gino who undertook studies about honesty is under fire for allegedly fabricating papers that she worked on, according to a report.

nypost.com

 

[Sejanus]

People are idiots thinking they can get away with stuff like this.
Credibility gone like a fart in a hurricane

 

[Ella Mayo]

This story is hardly news. Academia is utterly compromised and corrupt. Kings have always had their court intellectuals, lying to extend and solidify power:

“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines,” stated Dr. Marcia Angell, the former editor of The New England Journal of Medicine. “I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor,” she wrote in a 2009 piece titled “Drug Companies & Doctors: A Story of Corruption.”

Years later, Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet echoed this sentiment: “… Something has gone fundamentally wrong with one of our greatest human creations … The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.”

READ REST:

The Faux Faith of Modern Science - EcoFarming Daily

Modern science has taken a terrible turn. Corporate influence, conflicts of interest, ego and greed have corrupted the science of science if you will.

www.ecofarmingdaily.com

Why aren't squirrels' genitalia social constructs, but humans' supposedly are? Because the court intellectuals of humanity's rulers want that narrative pushed.

 

[Satanica]

All hierarchies, regardless of type, are prone to this. One either commits to integrity or not, and most of us would rather not make the effort and possible sacrifices that might entail.