• You must be logged in to see or use the Shoutbox. Besides, if you haven't registered, you really should. It's quick and it will make your life a little better. Trust me. So just register and make yourself at home with like-minded individuals who share either your morbid curiousity or sense of gallows humor.
Merge/move in general is correct. That doesn't mean I'm "moaning" about anything. :rolleyes: I don't like the somewhat recent trend here of anyone trying to make/suggest changes, or ideas of bettering things as being some whiney enemy of the site.

I never said anyone COULDN'T be a piece of shit on the DD (that's part of it!!), but I will call people out on it, end of story, and I know they aren't going to like it... I did it all the time with Jack, I didn't like that guy. Anyone that might be anyway related to these cases we talk about that might stumble upon this forum deserves as much. We actually have a history of having people involved coming here and commenting. I want to be the possibly one person that they see treating their story with dignity.

I do not recall anyone putting angel wings on photos. When was that and who did that??

I've been a mod, here and elsewhere in the past, it's not a pain in the ass. You can even use AI a bit to help out at this point, even via your phone, if that's how you interact as a mod. If you guys have no intention of addressing any reports, then I'd suggest removing that option. I don't give a shit about any drama. I've put a lot of time, effort, money, etc. into this site because I love it and will always help out in any way I can. I don't ever plan to leave unless Chris asks me to, I've said that before. If you guys feel that strongly tell him to tell me.

Your self- righteousness is appalling.
1744345034338.webp


I guess this comment that you liked was not disrespectful to the family to the family of the victims.

For the record I speak to many of the victims family in private messages and other avenues but that is between me and them.
 
@Jaded

He may be moaning about the Diddy Threads - which both are mine.

One was about Cassie and the other was about Diddy getting federally indicted.

He keeps trying to put updates into the Cassie Thread while I am putting them in the federal indictment thread.

I am not wasting my time reading anything this dishonest hypocrite says.
I DGAF about Diddy so I’ve never read those threads
 
@Turd Fergusen - if I'm reading all of this correctly, what people are saying is that you're trying to impose YOUR sense of right/wrong onto others and believing somehow that that should be enough to change what you believe to be errant behaviors. That's not reality. If it were, one of my former besties wouldn't have become a raging slut once she divorced her high school sweatheart based soley on my influence. But she did, depite my best efforts (one of the things that bonded us was how naturally chaste we both were) She went from being with one man for 20+/- years to doing multiple x multiple stangers on Adult Friend Finder in the space of four months. Pointing out our former shared traits had no influence on her. Looking back, it shouldn't have either. That's not what ended our friendship. I held on through the changes. It ended when she hit on the only man she had ever known me to have in 15+/- years of friendship, and she did it in front of her kids. Her kids were disgusted. My BF was disgusted. And I was heartbroken. Nothing I said changed a thing she did. Not to pour out my losses, but to me it proves the point I'm trying to make, You're you, Sugar is Sugar. The two styles can peacefully coexist if you both choose to... ;)
 
@Turd Fergusen - if I'm reading all of this correctly, what people are saying is that you're trying to impose YOUR sense of right/wrong onto others and believing somehow that that should be enough to change what you believe to be errant behaviors.... The two styles can peacefully coexist if you both choose to... ;)
Nope, not one single bit. This forum exists on the internet and is based from in the USA. I believe free speech exists here and I'm going to therefore reserve the right to call out anyone that is acting like of piece of shit. I don't give a shit if they or anyone changes anything at all, but that doesn't mean I'm not going to be quit. I've not ever asked for anyone to be banned or censored here. The only thing I've requested/reported is dupes or threads that need merged. I've just called out what I believe to be highly offensive and insulting behaviors, if you don't agree you don't have to pay any attention to my comments. My ONLY bottom line has always just been to just please think about being a little more respectful, to us these are articles and conversations, to those involved they are lost and abused loved ones which are unfortunately often times children. That being said, again if anyone stills want to be a piece of this, they are more than welcome to do so, no imposition required but I'm going to say what I'm going to say.
 
Nope, not one single bit. This forum exists on the internet and is based from in the USA. I believe free speech exists here and I'm going to therefore reserve the right to call out anyone that is acting like of piece of shit. I don't give a shit if they or anyone changes anything at all, but that doesn't mean I'm not going to be quit. I've not ever asked for anyone to be banned or censored here. The only thing I've requested/reported is dupes or threads that need merged. I've just called out what I believe to be highly offensive and insulting behaviors, if you don't agree you don't have to pay any attention to my comments. My ONLY bottom line has always just been to just please think about being a little more respectful, to us these are articles and conversations, to those involved they are lost and abused loved ones which are unfortunately often times children. That being said, again if anyone stills want to be a piece of this, they are more than welcome to do so, no imposition required but I'm going to say what I'm going to say.
So, because you don't like the way someone does something, the rest of us are GOING to hear about it. Got it. You do you Boo, just don't expect oodles of support for it when we're gentlly trying to help here. And if your only source of support is coming from one foul, dank corner, that might be a clue that you're on the wrong track... :banghead:
 
So, because you don't like the way someone does something, the rest of us are GOING to hear about it. Got it. You do you Boo, just don't expect oodles of support for it when we're gentlly trying to help here. And if your only source of support is coming from one foul, dank corner, that might be a clue that you're on the wrong track... :banghead:
NO! I literally have no idea what the hell you're talking about, but possibly yeah, if someone coming to this site for the first time to possibly see/revisit what could possibly be the worst day of their entire life might need to see that at least one single person was concerned about them and their family's feelings and wellbeing, then that's the side I want to be on. It's not about you and @Sugar Cookie and I don't know what else I can do to make that make that clear. Maybe you could understand if I put it in bold? THIS ISN'T ABOUT YOU, SUGAR COOKIE, OR ANYONE THAT IS A MEMBER OF THIS FORUM. This site has always been about so called "bad news", I don't understand the apparent controversy about me advocating to be more respectful to those whom this "bad news" directly pertains to.
 
NO! I literally have no idea what the hell you're talking about, but possibly yeah, if someone coming to this site for the first time to possibly see/revisit what could possibly be the worst day of their entire life might need to see that at least one single person was concerned about them and their family's feelings and wellbeing, then that's the side I want to be on. It's not about you and @Sugar Cookie and I don't know what else I can do to make that make that clear. Maybe you could understand if I put it in bold? THIS ISN'T ABOUT YOU, SUGAR COOKIE, OR ANYONE THAT IS A MEMBER OF THIS FORUM. This site has always been about so called "bad news", I don't understand the apparent controversy about me advocating to be more respectful to those whom this "bad news" directly pertains to.
Because it's getting to the point where you on your soap box is interfering. We get it. Does it need to be said ad nauseum? I never claimed it was about me. I don't see how calling out someone for behaviors that irk you is somehow better. You're advocating for strangers, but being unkind to people that are here. Putting in their time and effort for everyone. The snotty BOLDING SHIT is noted. Because I don't see the world exactly the way you do, I'm an imbecile that needs you to sound it out for me. Maybe it's THAT that I'm referring to? Somehow you're the only one here that gets to feel a certain way about things? You expose all of us to your 'corrections' of Sugar. Why are you immune from any fallout? :banghead:
 
@BuffettGirl

Let it go.

No one cares - even the powers that be told him he could leave and no one would care.

I mean it was pretty mean spirited to continually post about an elderly man who was falling or having cognitive failure - but it was in the New York Post so it was okay.
 
I mean it was pretty mean spirited to continually post about an elderly man who was falling or having cognitive failure - but it was in the New York Post so it was okay.
To be fair, given the way your were treated if you called the Left out on their Biden Bullshit, it was mildly amusing when Biden took EVERY opportunity to prove us correct... :angelic:
 
To be fair, given the way your were treated if you called the Left out on their Biden Bullshit, it was mildly amusing when Biden took EVERY opportunity to prove us correct... :angelic:
It is rich that Turd is not worried about any of the family members of the victims of this shooting having tio read his sanctimonious bullshit.

He has never been to busy for me but too busy to call out any other bullshit in this forum.

Did he call his puppet master out or even himself about making this thread all about themselves?
 
1746825789760.webp
1746825802340.webp

Wisconsin prosecutors have charged the father of a teenage girl who killed a teacher and fellow student in a school shooting last year with allowing her access to the semiautomatic pistols she used in the attack.
The criminal complaint against 42-year-old Jeffrey Rupnow of Madison details how his daughter, 15-year-old Natalie Rupnow, struggled with her parents’ divorce, showing her anger in a written piece entitled “War Against Humanity.”

Her father tried to bond with her through guns, the complaint said, even as she meticulously planned the attack, including building a cardboard model of the school and scheduling the shooting to end with her suicide.
Prosecutors filed the complaint Wednesday but didn’t unseal it until after Jeffrey Rupnow was arrested.
He faces two counts of intentionally giving a dangerous weapon to a person under 18, causing death, and contributing to the delinquency of a child. All of the charges are felonies.
Jeffrey Rupnow told investigators that his daughter lived with him but had been struggling with his divorce from her mother in 2022, saying she hated her life and wanted to kill herself. He said she used to cut herself to the point where he had to lock up all the knives in his house.

She had been in therapy to learn how to be more social until the spring before the attack, he told investigators.
Her mother, Melissa Rupnow, told detectives that the therapist told her that Natalie was suffering post-traumatic stress disorder stemming from the divorce.

One of Natalie’s friends told investigators that Jeffrey Rupnow was “frequently verbally aggressive” with Natalie and that she had told him that her father was a “drinker,” according to the complaint.
Jeffery Rupnow told investigators that took Natalie shooting with him on a friend’s land about two years before the Abundant Life attack. She enjoyed it, and he came to see guns as a way to connect with her. But he was shocked at how her interest in firearms “snow balled,” he told investigators.

He kept Natalie’s pistols in a gun safe, telling her that if she ever need them the access code was his Social Security number entered backward.
About 10 days before the school attack, he texted a friend and said that Natalie would shoot him if he left “the fun safe open right now,” according to the complaint.

The day before the school attack he took the Sig Sauer out of the safe so Natalie could clean it. But he got distracted and wasn’t sure if he put the weapon back in the safe or locked it, according to the complaint.
A search of Natalie’s room netted a six-page document the girl had written entitled “War Against Humanity.” She started the piece by describing humanity as “filth” and saying she hated people who don’t care and “smoke their lungs out with weed or drink as much as they can like my own father.”
She wrote about how she admired school shooters, how her mother was not in her life and how she obtained her weapons “by lies and manipulation, and my fathers stupidity.”
Read complete article here
 
View attachment 182633View attachment 182634










Read complete article here
About 10 days before the school attack, he texted a friend and said that Natalie would shoot him if he left “the fun safe open right now,” according to the complaint.

The day before the school attack he took the Sig Sauer out of the safe so Natalie could clean it. But he got distracted and wasn’t sure if he put the weapon back in the safe or locked it, according to the complaint.


Gave her the gun to clean and did not remember if he put it back in the safe or not? Is this guy an idiot or just a fricken drunk?
 
Back
Top