• You must be logged in to see or use the Shoutbox. Besides, if you haven't registered, you really should. It's quick and it will make your life a little better. Trust me. So just register and make yourself at home with like-minded individuals who share either your morbid curiousity or sense of gallows humor.

Turd Fergusen

Veteran Member
80477179.webp

City-dwelling dog owners are marking their “colonial” territory with pooches who are “gentrifying” neighborhoods, critics say in a bizarre online debate.

Sparking the controversy was a story in The Cut that delves into the growing hostility between dog owners and the dog-free in New York.

The article quotes Mia, of Prospects Lefferts Gardens, the proud owner of two terriers, who noticed a growing anti-dog sentiment brewing on her community Facebook group.

One post about picking up dog poop eventually spiraled into bonkers accusations that the pooches of PGL were “gentrifying the neighborhood.”

Mia, a New York-born Latina, told the outlet upon reading this she wondered “Are they saying that only white people have dogs?”

Another woman with an off-leash dog was apparently confronted in Prospect Park by someone filming her with her cellphone camera.

“She was asking me why I thought I was special, why my dog didn’t need to be leashed. Was it because of my white privilege?

In a viral tweet this week, an X user ran sparked further debate.

“Dogs in large cities are essentially settler-colonial—a way for their owners to move into and occupy more of the urban space than they are allotted while making it everyone else’s problem,” the tweet reads in part.


Full Article
 
"She was asking me why I thought I was special, why my dog didn’t need to be leashed. Was it because of my white privilege?"

Ugh. Honestly, I think stepping in dog shit is less bothersome than that kind of obnoxiousness. Having said that...
Aren't they supposed to be leashed?
Wasn't that the whole thing with the bird watching Black guy and the woman with the dog a couple of years ago?


"...pooches of PGL were “gentrifying the neighborhood.”"

I'm thinking maybe I don't understand what that word means.

I thought it meant turning a dilapidated shed into an expensive coffeeshop that no one in the neighborhood could afford, and attracting unbearable people sporting white mascara, pink eyeliner, severe Teutonic haircuts, and scowling faces who wanted to pay no less than $15 for shed coffee.

Are they bringing dogs with them? Wolfhounds, I imagine. Klaus and Petra. $3,500.00 Hermès leashes.
 
Jeez - I've never been this bored in my life! You legit have ZERO to do in life if you can waste time thinking about pets being 'evil colonizers'. And what about all of the lands in all of the world that were conquered before the first Europeans landed in North America? Is all of that colonization okeydokey? Were the ancient Mesopotamians evil colonizers too? What about the ancient Inca, Maya and Aztecs? Surely it can't ONLY be wHITE people that are evil colonizers? What about the land wars in Africa for millennia? Are those acceptable? Can we get a map from someone on how this world is 'supposed' to be divvied up? Does one even exist? Or does the lack thereof just mean that these useless tools now have something insidiously stupid to whine about forever? :banghead:
 
“Dogs in large cities are essentially settler-colonial—a way for their owners to move into and occupy more of the urban space than they are allotted while making it everyone else’s problem,” the tweet reads in part.
This has got to be rage bait. Space they are allotted? That's not how public spaces work. I guess you could say you are "allotted" the space on your own private property, but ALL of the public space belongs to ALL of the public.

That said, dog owners who don't pick up their dogs shit, or have their dogs off leash in non-off leash areas irk me something fierce.
 
Back
Top