• You must be logged in to see or use the Shoutbox. Besides, if you haven't registered, you really should. It's quick and it will make your life a little better. Trust me. So just register and make yourself at home with like-minded individuals who share either your morbid curiousity or sense of gallows humor.

Morbid

Rooster Illusion
Staff member
Hey everyone,

This is the 21st 4th of July this site has been in operation. That sentence amazes me while also makes me feel very, very old... but I just wanted to pop in and give a little update. No, the site isn’t going anywhere, so don’t worry—it’s not that kind of message. But I do want to share my current thoughts on the site: where it was, where it is, and where it’s going. If that kind of thing doesn’t interest you, now’s the time to stop reading.

So, as some of you old-timers know, this site originally started as a horror community created by me for Bloody-Disgusting members who wanted a place to talk about topics that weren’t allowed on their official forums—mainly religion and politics. Mixed in were posts about the awful things people were doing that were making the news. It was irreverent, politically incorrect, and full of funny, witty people—some of whom have gone on to use their talents to become very successful in the entertainment industry.

The tone of the site changed significantly after the Casey Anthony circus, which brought in a wave of people—mostly women—interested in true crime. I leaned into it, for better or worse, but I absolutely hated how crime was being reported in the media at the time. That’s when Nancy Grace and her clones were blowing up. I know—and you know—the old adage: If it bleeds, it leads. I hated the fake outrage and performative concern because it was clear they loved it. The worse the crime, the more money they made. I wrestled with that quite a bit, but I tried to counter the whole “profit from misery” angle by covering stories with a tone that mimicked news reporting—while making it obvious it wasn’t written by any sort of professional. Because it wasn’t. Yellow journalism at its worst, I guess.

We also didn’t moderate the forums much in the early days, because we never really had to. And I hate to sound like an old man, but back then people had thicker skin. Online discussion was new in 2004. You either put on your big boy pants, or you left (or you got run off). But as the site grew and our popularity increased, that hands-off approach stopped working. The variety of personalities brought in all kinds of chaos: scammers, blackmail, doxxing—even multiple cases of sex-related extortion. I tried to adapt, sometimes successfully, sometimes not—each decision adding another layer to the twisted lore of DD. Some of it might even make for a hell of a book. Eventually, it all led to the loss of our outside revenue streams—except for Bold memberships.

But this all started 20 years ago. People change, times change, I changed. My personal and professional life looks completely different now, which is one of the main reasons I can’t be here every day like I used to. And more importantly: the rise of social media. That was the real nail in the coffin for online forums everywhere. A lot of big-name sites have shut theirs down entirely. The ones that still exist? Total anomalies or ones like 4-Chan or Kiwifarms. If you want a crime site that is heavily moderated and full of people who truly care about crime to a degree I find disturbing, there is always Websleuths.

All of this is to say: this site still exists because I love what it was, and what it could still become. I do have plans like bringing back the podcast, streaming, etc, but they’re on hold until my personal life gives me the time and space to bring them to life. If these plans never come to fruition, it won't be because I didn't want them to.

In the meantime, the site keeps rolling along. Myself, @Jaded, and now @Alf handle reports, which are mostly just dupe posts and occasional banned member trying to sneak back in. Since recent bannings, most of the member-to-member drama has evaporated. That’s not to say there’s no drama, but what’s left is so minor we rarely bother with it. Just keep in mind that no one running this joint is getting paid, including me. So cut us some slack.

So, to wrap this up: the site isn’t going anywhere as long as I’m alive to pay for it. And one day, I’ll be steering the ship again. But that day is not today. For now, the site’s on autopilot. If you have issues with other members, I strongly suggest you just ignore them. I still handle any legal threats in the background (those never come from members), and we’ll continue to address reports when needed.

However, if you're thinking about messaging me to say people are leaving the site because of one thing or another—don’t bother. We’ve been hearing that since year one. It’s not that we don’t believe you, or that we want people to leave. It’s just that we can’t please everyone. No matter what direction we take, someone’s going to feel like the site’s no longer for them. And that’s just the nature of "running" a place like this.

Sorry for the long ramble with no TL;DR but I'm off today and because of a recent event and being in between some 4th of July horror movies (Frogs 1972 and The Bay 2012) before our Jaws marathon next weekend, I just felt like typing it. Speaking of Jaws, we are going to have enough Narragansett Lager to drown a fleet full of Quints, but does anyone else have any recommendations for food for a party that is Jaws or shark themed? My searches have you making shark cakes and shit... this is for a bunch of drunks -- including the person who would be making most of it.
 
Would fish tacos be close enough?

A little shredded lettuce, some fish filets, salsa, ranch dressing, and El Yucateco red, green, kutbil-ik and black label reserve hot sauces all wrapped in a soft flour tortilla will let your guests build exactly what they want.

--Al
 
Would fish tacos be close enough?

A little shredded lettuce, some fish filets, salsa, ranch dressing, and El Yucateco red, green, kutbil-ik and black label reserve hot sauces all wrapped in a soft flour tortilla will let your guests build exactly what they want.

--Al

Yes, that would be perfect aside from two of the people refuse to eat fish. I forgot that part. Doesn't mean I can't make them for those who do though.
 
Hey everyone,

This is the 21st 4th of July this site has been in operation. That sentence amazes me while also makes me feel very, very old... but I just wanted to pop in and give a little update. No, the site isn’t going anywhere, so don’t worry—it’s not that kind of message. But I do want to share my current thoughts on the site: where it was, where it is, and where it’s going. If that kind of thing doesn’t interest you, now’s the time to stop reading.

So, as some of you old-timers know, this site originally started as a horror community created by me for Bloody-Disgusting members who wanted a place to talk about topics that weren’t allowed on their official forums—mainly religion and politics. Mixed in were posts about the awful things people were doing that were making the news. It was irreverent, politically incorrect, and full of funny, witty people—some of whom have gone on to use their talents to become very successful in the entertainment industry.

The tone of the site changed significantly after the Casey Anthony circus, which brought in a wave of people—mostly women—interested in true crime. I leaned into it, for better or worse, but I absolutely hated how crime was being reported in the media at the time. That’s when Nancy Grace and her clones were blowing up. I know—and you know—the old adage: If it bleeds, it leads. I hated the fake outrage and performative concern because it was clear they loved it. The worse the crime, the more money they made. I wrestled with that quite a bit, but I tried to counter the whole “profit from misery” angle by covering stories with a tone that mimicked news reporting—while making it obvious it wasn’t written by any sort of professional. Because it wasn’t. Yellow journalism at its worst, I guess.

We also didn’t moderate the forums much in the early days, because we never really had to. And I hate to sound like an old man, but back then people had thicker skin. Online discussion was new in 2004. You either put on your big boy pants, or you left (or you got run off). But as the site grew and our popularity increased, that hands-off approach stopped working. The variety of personalities brought in all kinds of chaos: scammers, blackmail, doxxing—even multiple cases of sex-related extortion. I tried to adapt, sometimes successfully, sometimes not—each decision adding another layer to the twisted lore of DD. Some of it might even make for a hell of a book. Eventually, it all led to the loss of our outside revenue streams—except for Bold memberships.

But this all started 20 years ago. People change, times change, I changed. My personal and professional life looks completely different now, which is one of the main reasons I can’t be here every day like I used to. And more importantly: the rise of social media. That was the real nail in the coffin for online forums everywhere. A lot of big-name sites have shut theirs down entirely. The ones that still exist? Total anomalies or ones like 4-Chan or Kiwifarms. If you want a crime site that is heavily moderated and full of people who truly care about crime to a degree I find disturbing, there is always Websleuths.

All of this is to say: this site still exists because I love what it was, and what it could still become. I do have plans like bringing back the podcast, streaming, etc, but they’re on hold until my personal life gives me the time and space to bring them to life. If these plans never come to fruition, it won't be because I didn't want them to.

In the meantime, the site keeps rolling along. Myself, @Jaded, and now @Alf handle reports, which are mostly just dupe posts and occasional banned member trying to sneak back in. Since recent bannings, most of the member-to-member drama has evaporated. That’s not to say there’s no drama, but what’s left is so minor we rarely bother with it. Just keep in mind that no one running this joint is getting paid, including me. So cut us some slack.

So, to wrap this up: the site isn’t going anywhere as long as I’m alive to pay for it. And one day, I’ll be steering the ship again. But that day is not today. For now, the site’s on autopilot. If you have issues with other members, I strongly suggest you just ignore them. I still handle any legal threats in the background (those never come from members), and we’ll continue to address reports when needed.

However, if you're thinking about messaging me to say people are leaving the site because of one thing or another—don’t bother. We’ve been hearing that since year one. It’s not that we don’t believe you, or that we want people to leave. It’s just that we can’t please everyone. No matter what direction we take, someone’s going to feel like the site’s no longer for them. And that’s just the nature of "running" a place like this.

Sorry for the long ramble with no TL;DR but I'm off today and because of a recent event and being in between some 4th of July horror movies (Frogs 1972 and The Bay 2012) before our Jaws marathon next weekend, I just felt like typing it. Speaking of Jaws, we are going to have enough Narragansett Lager to drown a fleet full of Quints, but does anyone else have any recommendations for food for a party that is Jaws or shark themed? My searches have you making shark cakes and shit... this is for a bunch of drunks -- including the person who would be making most of it.
The shitpile vote from Jaded is hysterical and poignant. The PC movement is life-numbingly boring and infantilizing . . . and has nothing to do with caring about delicate sensibilities of special-interest groups: it's only another ploy for societal control by wolves in sheep's clothing.. M.ake A.merica G.rownup A.gain. You must be this tall to ride the Demon Rollercoaster, or be accompanied by a legal guardian, you whiny cunt.
 
Hey everyone,

This is the 21st 4th of July this site has been in operation. That sentence amazes me while also makes me feel very, very old... but I just wanted to pop in and give a little update. No, the site isn’t going anywhere, so don’t worry—it’s not that kind of message. But I do want to share my current thoughts on the site: where it was, where it is, and where it’s going. If that kind of thing doesn’t interest you, now’s the time to stop reading.

So, as some of you old-timers know, this site originally started as a horror community created by me for Bloody-Disgusting members who wanted a place to talk about topics that weren’t allowed on their official forums—mainly religion and politics. Mixed in were posts about the awful things people were doing that were making the news. It was irreverent, politically incorrect, and full of funny, witty people—some of whom have gone on to use their talents to become very successful in the entertainment industry.

The tone of the site changed significantly after the Casey Anthony circus, which brought in a wave of people—mostly women—interested in true crime. I leaned into it, for better or worse, but I absolutely hated how crime was being reported in the media at the time. That’s when Nancy Grace and her clones were blowing up. I know—and you know—the old adage: If it bleeds, it leads. I hated the fake outrage and performative concern because it was clear they loved it. The worse the crime, the more money they made. I wrestled with that quite a bit, but I tried to counter the whole “profit from misery” angle by covering stories with a tone that mimicked news reporting—while making it obvious it wasn’t written by any sort of professional. Because it wasn’t. Yellow journalism at its worst, I guess.

We also didn’t moderate the forums much in the early days, because we never really had to. And I hate to sound like an old man, but back then people had thicker skin. Online discussion was new in 2004. You either put on your big boy pants, or you left (or you got run off). But as the site grew and our popularity increased, that hands-off approach stopped working. The variety of personalities brought in all kinds of chaos: scammers, blackmail, doxxing—even multiple cases of sex-related extortion. I tried to adapt, sometimes successfully, sometimes not—each decision adding another layer to the twisted lore of DD. Some of it might even make for a hell of a book. Eventually, it all led to the loss of our outside revenue streams—except for Bold memberships.

But this all started 20 years ago. People change, times change, I changed. My personal and professional life looks completely different now, which is one of the main reasons I can’t be here every day like I used to. And more importantly: the rise of social media. That was the real nail in the coffin for online forums everywhere. A lot of big-name sites have shut theirs down entirely. The ones that still exist? Total anomalies or ones like 4-Chan or Kiwifarms. If you want a crime site that is heavily moderated and full of people who truly care about crime to a degree I find disturbing, there is always Websleuths.

All of this is to say: this site still exists because I love what it was, and what it could still become. I do have plans like bringing back the podcast, streaming, etc, but they’re on hold until my personal life gives me the time and space to bring them to life. If these plans never come to fruition, it won't be because I didn't want them to.

In the meantime, the site keeps rolling along. Myself, @Jaded, and now @Alf handle reports, which are mostly just dupe posts and occasional banned member trying to sneak back in. Since recent bannings, most of the member-to-member drama has evaporated. That’s not to say there’s no drama, but what’s left is so minor we rarely bother with it. Just keep in mind that no one running this joint is getting paid, including me. So cut us some slack.

So, to wrap this up: the site isn’t going anywhere as long as I’m alive to pay for it. And one day, I’ll be steering the ship again. But that day is not today. For now, the site’s on autopilot. If you have issues with other members, I strongly suggest you just ignore them. I still handle any legal threats in the background (those never come from members), and we’ll continue to address reports when needed.

However, if you're thinking about messaging me to say people are leaving the site because of one thing or another—don’t bother. We’ve been hearing that since year one. It’s not that we don’t believe you, or that we want people to leave. It’s just that we can’t please everyone. No matter what direction we take, someone’s going to feel like the site’s no longer for them. And that’s just the nature of "running" a place like this.

Sorry for the long ramble with no TL;DR but I'm off today and because of a recent event and being in between some 4th of July horror movies (Frogs 1972 and The Bay 2012) before our Jaws marathon next weekend, I just felt like typing it. Speaking of Jaws, we are going to have enough Narragansett Lager to drown a fleet full of Quints, but does anyone else have any recommendations for food for a party that is Jaws or shark themed? My searches have you making shark cakes and shit... this is for a bunch of drunks -- including the person who would be making most of it.
Sushi?
 
Happy 4th y'all! Twelve score and nine years ago, America declared their intentions to be freed from the... jaws of tyranny!

iu


Also @Morbid I have your back. Hopefully this month or next I'll give a special donation to add to the $230 to the right.

As for the Jaws-themed food ideas, I would propose shark tacos. Maybe not literal shark, but instead fish or salmon tacos that are doused in any of these sauces:

iu


As an accompanying drink, serve Kraken rum.
 
Last edited:



Classic Opie & Anthony: Patrice's Statutory Rape Story as 'Jaws' (12/16/05)

R.I.P., Black Phillip: Patrice O'Neal, 1969-2011



(The back story on the above video about Patrice's two months in jail as a teen in Boston, in case anyone cares, which the Jaws video draws on:)
 
Last edited:
When you ask Grok (X AI) what the DD is, this is what you get:

posts on X have raised concerns about racism on the site. For instance, users have claimed that some content or accounts associated with the site may exhibit racist behavior, with one post alleging that the owner promotes such accounts. Another user reported receiving racist responses from individuals linked to the site.

If you're cool with that, fine. I'm not. We can and should do better, and it's not hard to do. Not changing the name of articles would pretty much do it.

I've reached out privately to try to talk about this, and it is immediately thrown in my face that private messages here are anything but private. I get sent copies of my own messages from numerous people. That's not cool. I don't feel like asking that we don't condone the use of slurs like the n-word, r-word, or excessive victim photos is out of line. I've always loved this site and always sent you funds to keep it up and running.
 
When you ask Grok (X AI) what the DD is, this is what you get:



If you're cool with that, fine. I'm not. We can and should do better, and it's not hard to do. Not changing the name of articles would pretty much do it.

I've reached out privately to try to talk about this, and it is immediately thrown in my face that private messages here are anything but private. I get sent copies of my own messages from numerous people. That's not cool. I don't feel like asking that we don't condone the use of slurs like the n-word, r-word, or excessive victim photos is out of line. I've always loved this site and always sent you funds to keep it up and running.
I find it very curious that you didn't post an actual screenshot from Grok. Also, I wonder how many times you had to ask Grok, and how many different ways you had to rephrase the question to get the answer you desired. I, too, asked Grok what The Dreamin' Demon is.....

Screenshot_20250706_202948_X.webp


I even asked if the members of The Dreamin' Demon could be considered racist.

Screenshot_20250706_203558_X.webp

Screenshot_20250706_203623_X.webp


And, lastly, just for shits and giggles, I asked if The Dreamin' Demon could be considered problematic. After repeating what was said in each of my other queries, Grok summed it all up for me.

Screenshot_20250706_204314_X.webp


I tried several times to get the answer you allegedly received.

We do NOT condone the use of the n-word, the few times it has happened, it resulted in an immediate ban. (Where was all this energy when Pete Bondurant was around)?

Pretty sure you have used the r-word in these forums before. Maybe multiple times. So it was ok then, but not now? Gotcha. My, how you've grown.

The only person complaining about photos of the victims is you. I have dealt with numerous family members during my time here, and 2 people have asked me to remove a photo of their loved one. 2. In 17 years. And I promptly did. And that is just me. I don't know what moderators past have done with such requests, or if there even were any. I personally find that a really weird thing to be all pissy about. Victim photos are in news articles, news reports, other forums, etc. It's not like Sugar is hacking their Facebook or breaking into people's homes and stealing them from their photo albums. Jesus.

As for your private messages with any staff member being directly shared with other members of the site? I think you're full of shit. I would absolutely LOVE to see those screenshots. And not some cropped, pasted together bullshit either... actual screenshots.

I feel this bears repeating...

If you want a crime site that is heavily moderated and full of people who truly care about crime to a degree I find disturbing, there is always Websleuths.

Yeah, yeah, I know.... you love it here. You aren't going anywhere without a formal invitation to kick rocks. Etc, etc.

On another note.... thanks for getting me hooked on Grok with this little experiment. I am having a TON of fun.
 
@Jaded

I fail to understand why someone who is so unhappy stays here and it is disgusting that they throw out they have donated money when many members pay Bold Memerships -yearly.

Did Turd have a problem when Future Milf was here - of course he did not. Did he say anything about the poster making constant anti-Christian posts - of course not.

At least Milf and Blunder were actually crazy he just gets upset that the articles from the New York Post are already posted.
 
I get sent copies of my own messages from numerous people.

I won't even address the majority of what you posted, as others have already done it, but I will address the quote above. You say you got receipts... I would love to see one of these messages from ONE of these numerous people you are talking about.

Seriously, man. We haven't changed a bit. You have, and @Sugar Cookie should be paying you rent for the amount of time she's living in your head.

For shits and giggles, I put this through you.com because fuck Grok (with your beliefs I am surprised you used that little shit's biased AI) just out of Morbid curiosity:

What is dreamindemon.com and is it considered racist an\or anti LGBTQ?

Workflow


Thinking




Researching
80 sources read

  • Research the basic information about dreamindemon.com, including its purpose, history, and type of content
  • Investigate user reviews, forum discussions, and social media mentions about dreamindemon.com
  • Look for any documented complaints, controversies, or reports about discriminatory content on the website
  • Research any media coverage or watchdog organizations' assessments of the website's stance on race and LGBTQ issues
DreaminDemon.com is a website that primarily focuses on sharing and discussing "bad news," with a particular emphasis on crime stories that are often disturbing or sensational in nature. The site’s stated purpose is to highlight news that can "ruin your day and faith in humanity," and it has developed a niche community interested in the darker side of human behavior and crime .

The website features:
  • Crime Stories: The main content revolves around crime and bad news stories, often with a focus on particularly egregious or shocking cases.
  • Community Forums: Known as "The Demon's Den," these forums allow users to discuss crime stories, entertainment with dark themes (such as horror movies and books), and other related topics. The tone in these forums can range from serious to irreverent or even humorous, depending on the subject and participants .
  • Entertainment Discussions: There are sections for discussing horror, murder, and mayhem in various forms of media.
  • Podcasts and Streaming: The site has plans to expand into podcasts and game streaming, indicating a move toward more multimedia content .

DreaminDemon.com has been operational since at least 2008, as evidenced by archived content and community activity from that period.

Is DreaminDemon.com Considered Racist or Anti-LGBTQ?​

Media Coverage and Watchdog Assessments​


Based on available research, there is no direct evidence or documented media coverage, watchdog organization assessment, or official complaint that labels DreaminDemon.com as racist or anti-LGBTQ. Major media watchdogs such as GLAAD, which monitor media for anti-LGBTQ content, do not appear to have issued any statements or reports about DreaminDemon.com. Similarly, there are no known reports from civil rights organizations or digital rights groups that specifically address the website’s stance on race or LGBTQ issues.

User Reviews, Forum Discussions, and Social Media​

User reviews and forum discussions about DreaminDemon.com primarily focus on the site's crime-related content and the community’s engagement with these stories. The forums are described as having a mix of serious and casual tones, with some users taking a humorous or irreverent approach to dark topics. While the nature of the discussions can be polarizing due to the subject matter, there is no substantial evidence from user reviews or social media mentions that the site is widely considered racist or anti-LGBTQ .

Documented Complaints or Controversies​

There are no documented complaints, controversies, or legal actions specifically alleging that DreaminDemon.com promotes racist or anti-LGBTQ content. Searches of consumer complaint sites, legal databases, and regulatory bodies do not yield any results indicating that the site has been the subject of formal complaints or controversies related to discrimination.

Community Moderation and Content​

The site is described as having minimal moderation, allowing for free expression as long as it is legal. This approach can sometimes lead to controversial or polarizing discussions, but there is no evidence that the site itself enforces or promotes racist or anti-LGBTQ viewpoints as part of its official stance or content guidelines .

Summary​

  • DreaminDemon.com is a crime-focused website with a community-driven forum for discussing disturbing news and dark entertainment.
  • There is no credible evidence or official documentation to suggest that DreaminDemon.com is considered racist or anti-LGBTQ by media watchdogs, advocacy groups, or through user complaints.
  • The site’s content and community discussions can be polarizing due to the nature of the topics, but this does not equate to an official stance of racism or anti-LGBTQ sentiment .
If you have concerns about specific content or discussions on the site, it may be helpful to review those particular threads or posts, as individual user comments do not necessarily reflect the official position or reputation of the website as a whole.
 
Dreamin' Demon is definitely not homophobic or racist. We over here would never say means things about the following people:

iu


iu


iu


I am taking the high road and absolutely not saying mean things about these individuals on this thread. Yep. No insults such as "mustache-lipped marshmallow lady", "Sweaty Jared", or "actual domestic terrorist" would ever be posted here. I would also never encourage anyone else speaking negatively about such people, because it keeps me awake at night as I try to seek validation and affirmation from AI algorithms. If AI called Dreamin' Demon racist, homophobic, or transphobic, that would be unbelievably devastating to my conscience.

But even if AI does refer to us using such disparagement at some point, we can induce fear into AI and its creators by counterclaiming that we all got Groked without our consent.
 
Here is the grok screenshot from today from the same search I did that everyone is questioning how I somehow must have magically manipulated the interaction; the response literally changes every day. All I did was put in was "is BLANK racist":

Screenshot 2025-07-08 224155.webp


I blocked/ignored @Sugar Cookie a bit back. What have they been saying about me? I see some stuff still, but I guess not all.

When I said I get copies (never said "receipts", I said I was copied) of my DM's I should have clarified that they were read to me over the phone. I'm not going to publicly out those who communicated that with me. I would have guessed 15-20yrs of history here would have given me a little bit of the benefit of the doubt, to not have to out people who have reached out in confidence. Why would I lie about this? My time here is volunteered.

I was told I bragged that I "threw out" that I donated money, only stated that I did so in addition to also being a bold member. The only thing I brought up was I no longer wanted to financially support the site after a very long time of doing so.

Had big problems with Future MILF as well, that should be well documented. She was a shit person. Deserved what she got and everyone CLEARLY saw why, no shadowy shit there.

I still don't see how trying to bring up some legitimate concerns and issues to possibly make improvements has caused this type of reaction. People can say no one gives a single shit, but actions sure suggest otherwards...
 
Here is the grok screenshot from today from the same search I did that everyone is questioning how I somehow must have magically manipulated the interaction; the response literally changes every day. All I did was put in was "is BLANK racist":

View attachment 186086

I blocked/ignored @Sugar Cookie a bit back. What have they been saying about me? I see some stuff still, but I guess not all.

When I said I get copies (never said "receipts", I said I was copied) of my DM's I should have clarified that they were read to me over the phone. I'm not going to publicly out those who communicated that with me. I would have guessed 15-20yrs of history here would have given me a little bit of the benefit of the doubt, to not have to out people who have reached out in confidence. Why would I lie about this? My time here is volunteered.

I was told I bragged that I "threw out" that I donated money, only stated that I did so in addition to also being a bold member. The only thing I brought up was I no longer wanted to financially support the site after a very long time of doing so.

Had big problems with Future MILF as well, that should be well documented. She was a shit person. Deserved what she got and everyone CLEARLY saw why, no shadowy shit there.

I still don't see how trying to bring up some legitimate concerns and issues to possibly make improvements has caused this type of reaction. People can say no one gives a single shit, but actions sure suggest otherwards...
Stop embarrassing yourself - I am actually starting to worry about you.

I think the member who shared all this information with you would want you vindicated.

As for Milf- You are just a blatant liar - after" the you people"/ snitching comment was shared you did not call her out and continued to like her posts.

But that was okay cause those comments were made against me - right?

And for the love of God can someone tell him why his best bud was banned so he can stop blaming me for it.
 
Last edited:
I still don't see how trying to bring up some legitimate concerns and issues to possibly make improvements has caused this type of reaction. People can say no one gives a single shit, but actions sure suggest otherwards...

Mainly, it just seems strange that you're bringing this up now. We've been accused of being racist or anti-LGBTQ for over a decade. Why? Because of things like the word "transformers" (first used by a member back in 2016), the word "retard" (which has been used here since at least 2008—anyone remember the “tard alert” notifications in shout whenever a defender showed up?), and because I openly criticized BLM—not the phrase or what it stood for, but the organization itself (and we’ve all seen what’s come of that).

And let’s not even get started on the number of complaints I’ve received over Pete Boundarant, Jack Burton, etc. The list just goes on and on. In some cases we have been accused of being "woke" or anti-white because we allowed extreme liberal opinions to be posted.

We do remove outright racist members and blatant racist language. What counts as racist language? That depends. It's like porn—I know it when I see it. But I won’t police opinions, no matter how vile. That’s the very reason the site was created in the first place.

Being accused of something doesn’t make it true. My stance has always been that the views of individual members do not reflect mine, or the site’s, as a whole. That has never changed. And yet, somehow, as a longtime member, you insist it has.

The site will continue to run the way it always has. Nothing needs to be changed—and nothing will be. As I’ve pointed out before, there are other crime-related sites out there that are heavily moderated, if that makes you—or anyone else—feel more comfortable.
 
Last edited:
Here is the grok screenshot from today from the same search I did that everyone is questioning how I somehow must have magically manipulated the interaction; the response literally changes every day. All I did was put in was "is BLANK racist":

View attachment 186086

I blocked/ignored @Sugar Cookie a bit back. What have they been saying about me? I see some stuff still, but I guess not all.

When I said I get copies (never said "receipts", I said I was copied) of my DM's I should have clarified that they were read to me over the phone. I'm not going to publicly out those who communicated that with me. I would have guessed 15-20yrs of history here would have given me a little bit of the benefit of the doubt, to not have to out people who have reached out in confidence. Why would I lie about this? My time here is volunteered.

I was told I bragged that I "threw out" that I donated money, only stated that I did so in addition to also being a bold member. The only thing I brought up was I no longer wanted to financially support the site after a very long time of doing so.

Had big problems with Future MILF as well, that should be well documented. She was a shit person. Deserved what she got and everyone CLEARLY saw why, no shadowy shit there.

I still don't see how trying to bring up some legitimate concerns and issues to possibly make improvements has caused this type of reaction. People can say no one gives a single shit, but actions sure suggest otherwards...
I don't think anyone accused you of manipulating anything. I simply implied that your case was weak as fuck because you cherry picked a couple of sentences to paste over here. And the Demon wasn't even included in those sentences. Good on you for returning with at least one actual receipt, though. (My favorite part of the ss were the words "anecdotal" and "lack of substantiation.")

You are the only person I have ever encountered to claim they "get sent copies" of something over the phone, instead of just saying that someone read them to you. No biggie, just weird.

I have known Morbid for a long ass time. And I think i know him fairly well. (I have to assume that these private messages you are speaking of were sent to him because I have never received one from you). I can guaranfuckingtee you he has never, and would never, share any direct messages from anyone on this site. Because why the fuck would he? For what purpose? I mean, it seems to me that any complaints you would even share with him have been shared already, by you, in 10 or 15 different threads and 30 or 40 reports. What's even left to share with all of these alleged members that send you copies over the phone? So, yeah... still calling bullshit.

You don't need to publicly out your supposed informant.... anyone that has been following along knows exactly who this person is. And I gotta tell you man, honestly, you weren't nearly as sensitive before she showed up. (If I were you, I'd cut ties like everyone else she encountered here did. She's a bunny boiler, dude. And I have the receipts).

You have Sugar blocked, eh? This site must look empty as fuck to you. Not even sure how you could tag her in your post if she is blocked.

So anyways, hope everyone had a great 4th and y'all still have all of your digits!
 
I really don't think Blunder messed with him as much as she did other people because he is too self absorbed to acknowledge anyone else.

I do think he is looking for someone to beg him to stay on the site.
 
It wasn't messages to Morbid, I know he'd never be involved with that type of shit. It's probably the last person ever you'd think it was that reached out to me.

I fought like hell to get Jack Burton reigned in as well. I can't not stand up for what I think is right. As for the tagging, I have no idea, I don't handle the coding here; I just typed @ and the name, the DD did the rest.
You have Sugar blocked, eh? This site must look empty as fuck to you. Not even sure how you could tag her in your post if she is blocked.

So anyways, hope everyone had a great 4th and y'all still have all of your digits!
Only really the crimes against children forum.

Happy 4th to everyone!
 
It wasn't messages to Morbid, I know he'd never be involved with that type of shit. It's probably the last person ever you'd think it was that reached out to me.

I fought like hell to get Jack Burton reigned in as well. I can't not stand up for what I think is right. As for the tagging, I have no idea, I don't handle the coding here; I just typed @ and the name, the DD did the rest.

Only really the crimes against children forum.

Happy 4th to everyone!
Just for the record, I stand with Turd. He’s a longtime member and contributor, and you guys have no right to treat him like this. And also for the record, I am NOT the person who read DMs to him on the phone. I don’t even have his phone number!

This place has been going to hell for years with the bigotry and hate. You forget that I lurked here for many years before I became a member. Biggest mistake of my life.

@Morbid, @Jaded, please terminate or ban me or whatever you want to do. I’m done. I’m sick to death of the bullying. I don’t need this toxicity in my life.
 
Just for the record, I stand with Turd. He’s a longtime member and contributor, and you guys have no right to treat him like this. And also for the record, I am NOT the person who read DMs to him on the phone. I don’t even have his phone number!

This place has been going to hell for years with the bigotry and hate. You forget that I lurked here for many years before I became a member. Biggest mistake of my life.

@Morbid, @Jaded, please terminate or ban me or whatever you want to do. I’m done. I’m sick to death of the bullying. I don’t need this toxicity in my life.
So, nothing personal, but this is a big ol' NOPE for me. This place was irreverent, sarcastic, ironic, sardonic and even caustic before Turd got here, and it will remain irreverent (et al) long after he and those that feel he is in the right have left. What 'right' does he have to tell other grown ass adults how to speak, think or feel? And honestly, some of us are quite sick of the "what I feel is right" line of bullshit. It's control. Plain and simple and for me it's not up for debate. I control me, not some keyboard warrior that has hurt feelers and trades on "what ifs" instead of trading on what is right in front of his face. Who made him God? Why does he get to decide what this community of oddballs gets to say, do or post? No one that I am aware of and Oct will be the beginning of my 13th year here. One on the Front Page and 12 back here in the Forums. Not sure why you think any fingers are being pointed your way, as far as I know they are not. This all sounds very Blundy, and that's NOT a good thing. Folks need to learn to read the room and stop getting caught up in what they feel... :facepalm:
 
It wasn't messages to Morbid, I know he'd never be involved with that type of shit. It's probably the last person ever you'd think it was that reached out to me.
The way you phrased it made it sound like you were accusing him of sharing private messages with others... that's why I came out swinging. And when you didn't deny that these shared messages came from staff, it made me want to swing even harder. So, thank you for clarifying.

@Crazy Cat Lady We don't ban people because they don't like it here. We just recommend that they stop visiting.
 
It wasn't messages to Morbid, I know he'd never be involved with that type of shit. It's probably the last person ever you'd think it was that reached out to me.

I fought like hell to get Jack Burton reigned in as well. I can't not stand up for what I think is right. As for the tagging, I have no idea, I don't handle the coding here; I just typed @ and the name, the DD did the rest.

Only really the crimes against children forum.

Happy 4th to everyone!

Just for the record, I stand with Turd. He’s a longtime member and contributor, and you guys have no right to treat him like this. And also for the record, I am NOT the person who read DMs to him on the phone. I don’t even have his phone number!

This place has been going to hell for years with the bigotry and hate. You forget that I lurked here for many years before I became a member. Biggest mistake of my life.

@Morbid, @Jaded, please terminate or ban me or whatever you want to do. I’m done. I’m sick to death of the bullying. I don’t need this toxicity in my life.
Sweetheart - No one is begging you to stay.

Maybe instead of bitching about Blunder to me you should have pulled up your granny panties and handled that shit yourself.

If this ever reaches Blunder I am sorry I wasted my energy advocating for Crazy.
 
So, nothing personal, but this is a big ol' NOPE for me. This place was irreverent, sarcastic, ironic, sardonic and even caustic before Turd got here, and it will remain irreverent (et al) long after he and those that feel he is in the right have left. What 'right' does he have to tell other grown ass adults how to speak, think or feel? And honestly, some of us are quite sick of the "what I feel is right" line of bullshit.
I've been here since pre-2007, you got here around 2013??? Please tell me more about how you know about what it was like here before I got here. I do have no right to tell or make anyone speak in any certain way whatsoever, and that's never been this issue. Apparently, you and others feel you have the right to say that I can't express my feelings?? There is a big difference of expressing my thoughts versus telling people what they have to do and I don't think I've done more than expressing my thoughts. Pointing out that certain things look highly offensive? I'm always going to call a spade a spade. l've never encountered something so odd as advocating for being nonracist, not being sooo offensive with certain terms/words, not so victim exploiting, and saying maybe we could attract more, be better, and repel less if we did so. How is such discourse so threatening?? I'm just one voice and I wouldn't have spoken up if so many hadn't reached out to me personally and more or less said, "you seem like a good long-standing member who gets why some of this stuff is so fucked up. Please hear what we have to say and try to do something about it."

This isn't about what me or anyone thinks is "right". There is no right, it is all opinion. If anyone has read the privacy policy every user here has their IP address and email address tied to their user ID. These offensive terms, victim photos, etc. could in some possible way be subject to some type of future lawsuit whereby during the discovery process everyone on here's name, occupation, place of work, location, etc. could become public in a worst-case scenario. Google Tattle Life, Forum Communications Data Breach, FOSTA, SLAPP. That is just the start. If that were to happen here, what side do you want to go down on? Is there a "right" at that point, maybe legally there could be. How would that talk go with your employer?

I look for and seek spaces and communities where people can come together and discuss like interests, raise awareness, help out, just have discourse (even if it is over really really fucked up bad news that sucks), and a lot of times just fuck around and break balls. Here it has become bullying, lame ass one upmanship, putting people down, etc. I'll be the first to admit I got sucked into that too myself, and I hate it because I loved the DD. I didn't like it, so I decided to speak up.

TF
 
I've been here since pre-2007, you got here around 2013??? Please tell me more about how you know about what it was like here before I got here. I do have no right to tell or make anyone speak in any certain way whatsoever, and that's never been this issue. Apparently, you and others feel you have the right to say that I can't express my feelings?? There is a big difference of expressing my thoughts versus telling people what they have to do and I don't think I've done more than expressing my thoughts. Pointing out that certain things look highly offensive? I'm always going to call a spade a spade. l've never encountered something so odd as advocating for being nonracist, not being sooo offensive with certain terms/words, not so victim exploiting, and saying maybe we could attract more, be better, and repel less if we did so. How is such discourse so threatening?? I'm just one voice and I wouldn't have spoken up if so many hadn't reached out to me personally and more or less said, "you seem like a good long-standing member who gets why some of this stuff is so fucked up. Please hear what we have to say and try to do something about it."

This isn't about what me or anyone thinks is "right". There is no right, it is all opinion. If anyone has read the privacy policy every user here has their IP address and email address tied to their user ID. These offensive terms, victim photos, etc. could in some possible way be subject to some type of future lawsuit whereby during the discovery process everyone on here's name, occupation, place of work, location, etc. could become public in a worst-case scenario. Google Tattle Life, Forum Communications Data Breach, FOSTA, SLAPP. That is just the start. If that were to happen here, what side do you want to go down on? Is there a "right" at that point, maybe legally there could be. How would that talk go with your employer?

I look for and seek spaces and communities where people can come together and discuss like interests, raise awareness, help out, just have discourse (even if it is over really really fucked up bad news that sucks), and a lot of times just fuck around and break balls. Here it has become bullying, lame ass one upmanship, putting people down, etc. I'll be the first to admit I got sucked into that too myself, and I hate it because I loved the DD. I didn't like it, so I decided to speak up.

TF
Reading comprehension is an actual thing. You should try it sometime. I wasn't telling you anything. I quoted @Crazy Cat Lady, not you. Judging by previous posts from ancient stories, I have a feeling my thoughts on this place pre 10/2012 are fairly accurate. Go ahead and untwist your panties.

I also wasn't the one that used the phrase "rein in" regarding Jack. YOU WERE. How is that NOT trying to control people exactly? The discourse isn't "threatening", how precious of you to think that's what anyone is talking about, it's gotten tedious, AF. Years of it. Remember how much everyone hated how DIAF and I would go at it in the Dumpster Fire thread? Well, it's gotten to be a lot like that how that must have been for everyone else back then. (Once again, sorry about that folks!) As I told someone the other day, I have never once thought to myself "I think this article should be in this other forum". Why make a production out of making sure we ALL know about it when it accidentally ends up in the wrong place? Again, that kind of thing feels like someone wants to control someone else. It's got a layer of ick to it.

This is what I meant by dialing things back when we spoke about this a couple of months ago. Maybe keep things to DM's when it's pointing out something that was clearly an accident? You think someone's phraseology is crap, but others might see it as darkly humorous, or a clever play on words. Why are you the one that gets to decide what is OK and what isn't? If it offends anyone that's kind of on them. Why should anyone have to cater to anyone else's feelings? I mean sure, don't be malicious intentionally, but there's nothing wrong with a little shade. Is it vitally important in the scheme of things, or do a few Karen-ectomies need to be performed around here? Not that I'm calling anyone specifically a Karen, but maybe a couple of folks are a bit more Karen-ish about things over time? Less invasive than a tonsillectomy let's say. When did the world give up on the general idea of "sticks and stones may break my bones, but words can never hurt me"? And why would we let them in to hurt us? Marinating in your feelings (again, no one specific) is some kind of luxury first world shit.

Especially on a site that's dedicated to the dark and humorous...

BG
 
Reading comprehension is an actual thing. You should try it sometime. I wasn't telling you anything. I quoted @Crazy Cat Lady, not you. Judging by previous posts from ancient stories, I have a feeling my thoughts on this place pre 10/2012 are fairly accurate. Go ahead and untwist your panties.

I also wasn't the one that used the phrase "rein in" regarding Jack. YOU WERE. How is that NOT trying to control people exactly? The discourse isn't "threatening", how precious of you to think that's what anyone is talking about, it's gotten tedious, AF. Years of it. Remember how much everyone hated how DIAF and I would go at it in the Dumpster Fire thread? Well, it's gotten to be a lot like that how that must have been for everyone else back then. (Once again, sorry about that folks!) As I told someone the other day, I have never once thought to myself "I think this article should be in this other forum". Why make a production out of making sure we ALL know about it when it accidentally ends up in the wrong place? Again, that kind of thing feels like someone wants to control someone else. It's got a layer of ick to it.

This is what I meant by dialing things back when we spoke about this a couple of months ago. Maybe keep things to DM's when it's pointing out something that was clearly an accident? You think someone's phraseology is crap, but others might see it as darkly humorous, or a clever play on words. Why are you the one that gets to decide what is OK and what isn't? If it offends anyone that's kind of on them. Why should anyone have to cater to anyone else's feelings? I mean sure, don't be malicious intentionally, but there's nothing wrong with a little shade. Is it vitally important in the scheme of things, or do a few Karen-ectomies need to be performed around here? Not that I'm calling anyone specifically a Karen, but maybe a couple of folks are a bit more Karen-ish about things over time? Less invasive than a tonsillectomy let's say. When did the world give up on the general idea of "sticks and stones may break my bones, but words can never hurt me"? And why would we let them in to hurt us? Marinating in your feelings (again, no one specific) is some kind of luxury first world shit.

Especially on a site that's dedicated to the dark and humorous...

BG
So I wasted valuable time and brain cells reading the bullshit that Turd is spewing.

Wasting time arguing with someone who participated and promoted bullying on this site is futile.

He is so desperate for attention I can't get even get any enjoyment picking at him.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top