Surprise surprise...more bill barr lies
https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-...y-of-russia-probe-report-20190501-p51iw3.htmlA day after the letter was sent, Barr and Mueller spoke by phone for about 15 minutes, according to law enforcement officials.
In that call, Mueller said he was concerned that news coverage of the obstruction investigation was misguided and creating public misunderstandings about the office's work, according to Justice Department officials.
When Barr pressed him whether he thought Barr's letter was inaccurate, Mueller said he did not, but felt that the media coverage of the letter was misinterpreting the investigation, officials said.
In their call, Barr also took issue with Mueller calling his letter a "summary," saying he had never meant his letter to summarise the voluminous report, but instead provide an account of the top conclusions, officials said.
Surprise surprise...more bill barr lies
"In a cordial and professional conversation, the Special Counsel emphasized that nothing in the Attorney General's March 24 letter was inaccurate or misleading,"
Grasping at straws, much? This piggy won't fly, just go back to accusing everyone of being racist.
Grasping at straws, much? This piggy won't fly, just go back to accusing everyone of being racist.
I love how she gets right down to businessBarr Said He Won’t Show for House Hearing Thursday, Hill Aide Says
Attorney General William Barr has told the House Judiciary Committee that he won’t show up for a scheduled hearing Thursday about Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation, panel chairman Jerrold Nadler said.
Barr is “trying to blackmail the committee,” Nadler told reporters Wednesday evening, saying that the executive branch doesn’t get to dictate the format of the hearing. Nadler added that he may issue a subpoena for the attorney general to show up if he doesn’t relent.
Barr’s decision not to attend the hearing dramatically escalates tensions with the Democratic-controlled committee, which has already authorized a subpoena to the Justice Department to obtain an unredacted version of Mueller’s report as well as the underlying evidence. Nadler said the Justice Department is refusing to hand over the full report and the panel may issue a contempt citation.
… article continus
Post automatically merged:
Kamala Harris Earns Praise From Former Prosecutors For Barr Questioning
Democratic senator and 2020 candidate Kamala Harris garnered praise from legal experts on Wednesday after she appeared to stump Attorney General William Barr more than once during his congressional testimony on his handling of special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia report.
“This is what happens when Barr is asked a carefully worded question,” former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti tweeted in response to the tense exchange. “He can't figure out how to answer it the way he wants to without outright lying, which would be a crime.”
Legal analyst and former federal prosecutor Mimi Rocah added that Harris and fellow 2020 candidate Senator Amy Klobuchar “are excellent & tough questioners & I would love to see either or both of them debate Donald Trump.”
Harris, who previously served as the attorney general of California, grilled Barr over his decision to clear Donald Trump of obstruction of justice despite evidence of wrongdoing recorded in the special counsel’s 448-page report. Mueller investigated at least 10 incidents where the president attempted obstruction, including his multiple attempts to remove the special counsel.
“In reaching your conclusion, did you personally review all of the underlying evidence?” Harris asked the attorney general. Barr responded that he did not.
Harris continued, asking if Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who announced his resignation on Monday, had looked at any underlying evidence before coming to the official conclusion that Trump did not obstruct justice.
“No. We accepted the statements in the report as the factual record. We did not go underneath it to see whether or not they were accurate. We accepted it as accurate,” Barr replied. He then insisted that it wasn’t unusual for an official in his position not to review underlying evidence.
“I think you’ve made it clear sir that you have not looked at the evidence and we can move on,” Harris said.
Jill Wine-Banks, a former Watergate prosecutor, commended Harris for provoking Barr's revelatory admission in a Twitter post during the hearing.
… ar6ticle continues
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...r-barr-questioning/ar-AAAMmiy?ocid=spartanntp
Read the forum rules carefully, as you've got more than just a habit of making personal attacks and highly bigoted commentary that are unacceptable, even in regards to "Three Things".
https://dreamindemon.com/community/threads/the-definitive-forum-rules.74734/
Barr Said He Won’t Show for House Hearing Thursday, Hill Aide Says
Attorney General William Barr has told the House Judiciary Committee that he won’t show up for a scheduled hearing Thursday about Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation, panel chairman Jerrold Nadler said.
Barr is “trying to blackmail the committee,” Nadler told reporters Wednesday evening, saying that the executive branch doesn’t get to dictate the format of the hearing. Nadler added that he may issue a subpoena for the attorney general to show up if he doesn’t relent.
Barr’s decision not to attend the hearing dramatically escalates tensions with the Democratic-controlled committee, which has already authorized a subpoena to the Justice Department to obtain an unredacted version of Mueller’s report as well as the underlying evidence. Nadler said the Justice Department is refusing to hand over the full report and the panel may issue a contempt citation.
He's giving Trump a colonoscopy with his faceView attachment 16937View attachment 16939
Where oh where was William Barr? Back at the swamp perhaps???
Fred Flintstone didn't show up because he's a big coward.
When President Trump said on Wednesday that Senator Kamala Harris was “probably very nasty” in her questioning of Attorney General William P. Barr at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, he brought back sharp memories for many Democrats.
Barr: Was my letter inaccurate? Mueller: No. Barr: Was the media coverage of my letter inaccurate? Mueller: Yes.
She is nasty. She's a partisan hack who slept her way to the top. Did we all forget about that?
Cruz says it all.
The attack of Barr is a complete joke, I'd say it was a 'new low' for the Democrats but I still remember the Kavanaugh debacle. If you're a Democrat, and can't understand why you should be ashamed of your party - you are the problem. Not Trump, not 'old white men', not 'wypipo', not 'racisim', not 'the patriarchy' ... it's you. Because you're too biased to see the objective truth when it's staring you right in the face.
That being - Trump didn't 'collude' with Russia, he won't be charged with obstruction and the entire affair was based on a lie. A lie paid for by Clinton. Clinton -> DNC -> Fusion GPS -> Christoper Steele -> FISA -> Bullshit investigation(s) designed to undermine American democracy. All because your 'superiors' decided for you the HRC was ordained to be the next President.
And I know it's not because you are stupid, because you're not. It's because admitting the truth would force you to reconsider the incredibly partisan position that you have been clinging to, for what must seem like forever. You'd have to face the fact that you were wrong about something. Your pride just can't take it.
There was no conspiracy, deal with it and move on. You gave it your best shot and you still couldn't pin a thing on Trump. So now you attack Barr, because..... why, exactly? What did he do wrong? Accurately describe the conclusions of the Mueller investigation. What a joke.
I literally just reread his statement in his OWN words with his signature attached. You people seriously fucking cherry pick. I will post it in here at my lunch or when I'm off work. Then you can all reread it.
Unless you have proof and facts, shut your hole. We are not going to degrade an amazing woman of color just because you think she slept her way to the top.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...t_kamala_harris_slept_her_way_to_the_top.htmlYes, we dated. It was more than 20 years ago. Yes, I may have influenced her career by appointing her to two state commissions when I was Assembly speaker.
And I certainly helped with her first race for district attorney in San Francisco. I have also helped the careers of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Gov. Gavin Newsom, Sen. Dianne Feinstein and a host of other politicians.
- Willie Brown.
Bigots just HAAAATE educated black women, don't they?