Oddly, though, Khadijah's posts from the past seem different from the current ones.
Inconsistency is not a hallmark of a troll.
I completely understand why
@Khadijah irritates some members with the oddness, the attempts at familiarity, the obvious-to-us questions, etc.
If anything, a Do-no-harm troll.
That's understandable and everyone has their hard line of tolerance.
I'm not criticizing that.
What I AM criticizing is WHERE the finger pointing comes from IN THIS THREAD.
@Khadijah has called that Troll/member out for these Trolling behaviors:
Mutt: “Alternatively known as Dogs or Yapping Dogs. Mutts are pack animals characterized by their loud barking – vociferous, repetitive, usually ignorant, and irrational criticism of anything and anyone they do not like. Mutts often become obsessed with a few or even a single poster with whom they disagree, often for purely personal reasons. Like a dog gnawing at a bone, the Mutt will attack the object of its ire over and over, making a fool of itself in the eyes of those who understand such childish behavior for what it is.”
The “Un-PC” Racist/Misogynist
You post something cool, like an article about a woman training to become the first female navy seal, and this commenter has to let you know they doubt she qualifies. But then they hedge their bets saying she’ll pass because we live in a society of politically-correct “crybabies.” This is just one example of the way this comment troll exposes their own biases under the guise of “calling it like it is.”
Hate Monger: “One of the most nauseating types of Internet trolls is The Hate Monger. This commenter blasts the Internet, and otherwise civil discussion, with hate speech. Be it sexist, racist, homophobic (“GAY!” is an oft-used trolling one-off), or otherwise, the Hate Monger reflects the ignorant dregs of humanity.... ”
It astounds me that so few members speak against the pointer and their
foaming-at-the-mouth supporter(s) .
Which only leads me to believe that clichéd bigotry presented in pseudo-intellectual quotes or code words, is supported here.
Of course, there is no point in trying to fight them. If they can’t back something up with reality, they’ll make something up, just to show you how wrong you are, my posts countering their ridiculous words are saying:
" Yeah, the wicked person doesn't have any clothes on, don't coward out on telling them their bigoted views are unacceptable.".
I don't expect to influence/win the argument with the bigoted insane.
Unless you all think it's just fine to call someone a "Feminazi" for pointing out, amongst other bile, that a member is pushing an anti-Semitic narrative and conspiracy
Those of you who think YOU would have spoken out when genocide was occurring, for example, are wrong, if you can't speak up in a goddamn forum.
___
I understand why members would find
@Khadijah irritating, but why isn't a bigot MORE irritating?
You must be logged in to see or use the Shoutbox. Besides, if you haven't registered, you really should. It's quick and it will make your life a little better. Trust me. So just register and make yourself at home with like-minded individuals who share either your morbid curiousity or sense of gallows humor.
nypost.com
