• You must be logged in to see or use the Shoutbox. Besides, if you haven't registered, you really should. It's quick and it will make your life a little better. Trust me. So just register and make yourself at home with like-minded individuals who share either your morbid curiousity or sense of gallows humor.

Olivia

Well-Known Member
God knows this isn’t one of the horrific stories....thank God....That being said, this same God knows that I was honestly confused for a min....still am, to be honest.

LAFAYETTE, Ind. — The internet isn't as as Robert Joseph Love thought when he allegedly was coaching a 16-year-old boy to send him nude photos, according to a probable cause affidavit.

The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children tipped off area police that an online storage file housed child pornography and served as a clearing house for those wanting to access or exchange child pornography.
Investigators here traced the site back to Love, 31, 242 Woods Edge Court, West Lafayette, and his husband, Joshua Allen Love, 28.

Both were arrested Tuesday for the case that stretches back to the fall of 2017, and both face various charges of possession of child pornography, child solicitation and child exploitation.

Robert Love admitted he traded in images of children having sex with one another and admitted in chat rooms that he like younger boys, according to the affidavit.
The online storage file, which Joshua Love is accused of creating, allowed access to the public and contained files of children engaged in sex acts and images of children in various states of nudity.
Prosecutors charged the couple on June 21, but only unsealed the records Wednesday after their arrests.
Robert Love faces three counts of child exploitation, one count of child solicitation, and seven counts of possession of child pornography.
Joshua Love faces three counts of child exploitation and three counts of possession of child pornography.
The couple remain jailed Wednesday in lieu of bond.



Robert+and+Joshua+Love.PNG
 
Now you know that if the one on the left was a woman named Nancy, most comments would be along the lines of “wtf, that’s a chick?” Or “thought the article said ones female, whys the picture of 2 dudes?” Or, “Holy facial hair Batman”!
That being said, I read the article 3 times to figure out who the lady hambeast on the left was.
 
Back
Top