• You must be logged in to see or use the chatbox

I’m seriously starting to think you have to be trolling as a tribute to your former identity. Otherwise you’d see how immensely ignorant you come across.

Please site any respected medical article that would compare the removal of penile foreskin with the removal of the clitoris. The clitoris has long been established as the center of sexual pleasure for women and encompasses a phenomenal amount of nerve endings. That alone should hint to you the amount of pain one would experience in its removal.

So fuck you and fuck your made up shit about how you actually care about their “culture” or whatever. And I agree with you that it’s not a Muslim vs Christian gig. I don’t give a shit-it’s barbaric.

Somehow I doubt that if it was “cultural” for them to NOT keep a tidy abode you’d be jumping on the ole bandwagon. Dirty dishes, unswept floor, smudges on the walls, piles of laundry...but wait it gets worse...it’s their culture that children aren’t expected to HELP! OMG you’d be blowing a gasket.

But yeah you’re right-what’s incredible agonizing mutilation and a lifetime loss of sexual sensation compared to freshly made bed.

When we know better, we do better. Educate yourself.
I'll say this for the tenth time: If you don't want the procedure to be painful then legalize it so it can be done in a hospital with anesthetics.
And if you want scientific facts here they are: the foreskin contains 20,000 nerve endings while the clitoris contains only 8000. So male circumcision is arguably worse!

Just because you don't like foreign cultures doesn't mean I don't either. We don't all have to share your bigoted views. I don't consider people barbaric just because they're not white.

Also fyi, most women support the practice and celebrate it. They view it positively. Studies show that modest, chaste, and virtuous women tend to have happier lives than promiscuous degenerate women.
 

Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!

CentreAussie

Trusted Member
I'll say this for the tenth time: If you don't want the procedure to be painful then legalize it so it can be done in a hospital with anesthetics.
And if you want scientific facts here they are: the foreskin contains 20,000 nerve endings while the clitoris contains only 8000. So male circumcision is arguably worse!

Just because you don't like foreign cultures doesn't mean I don't either. We don't all have to share your bigoted views. I don't consider people barbaric just because they're not white.

Also fyi, most women support the practice and celebrate it. They view it positively. Studies show that modest, chaste, and virtuous women tend to have happier lives than promiscuous degenerate women.
LG, is that really you?

If so, I miss you.

If not, you're an apologist for barbarians. Go cut off your own clit and then tell us how virtuous you are.

My county makes me sick sometimes. The punishment for cutting the clitoris off a little girl should be the same as cutting off her head.... In Oklahoma.... our courts are weak AF.
 

Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!

LG, is that really you?

If so, I miss you.

If not, you're an apologist for barbarians. Go cut off your own clit and then tell us how virtuous you are.

My county makes me sick sometimes. The punishment for cutting the clitoris off a little girl should be the same as cutting off her head.... In Oklahoma.... our courts are weak AF.
You people really like to be dramatic. Fgm isn't that big a deal. There's far more serious issues affecting women, such as rape and child marriage.
 

Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!

Alf

Cereal Box Reader
Bold Member!
Studies show that modest, chaste, and virtuous women tend to have happier lives than promiscuous degenerate women.
And little girls must be deprived of their sexual pleasure as women in order to be "modest, chaste, and demure"?

Does that mean that women who have not had their clitorides cut off are immodest, unchaste, and bawdy?

Those people who think that "unable to experience sexual pleasure" is the same as "modest, chaste, and demure" can go buy themselves a blow-up doll, as far as I am concerned. I'll take my women intact, thankyuoverymuch, and for the pleasure of women's company -- both in and out of bed -- I'll take the chance she finds somebody else who really lights her fires. And if she decides she's going with him I will let her go and wish her the best.

--Al
 

Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!

And little girls must be deprived of their sexual pleasure as women in order to be "modest, chaste, and demure"?

Does that mean that women who have not had their clitorides cut off are immodest, unchaste, and bawdy?

Those people who think that "unable to experience sexual pleasure" is the same as "modest, chaste, and demure" can go buy themselves a blow-up doll, as far as I am concerned. I'll take my women intact, thankyuoverymuch, and for the pleasure of women's company -- both in and out of bed -- I'll take the chance she finds somebody else who really lights her fires. And if she decides she's going with him I will let her go and wish her the best.

--Al
Women aren't your sex objects. In the view of men like you women are only useful for sex.
 

Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!


Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!

Satanica

Veteran Member
Bold Member!
Well, you can't say this member isn't living up to his name! Jackass, indeed!

He accuses Alf of only viewing women in terms of sexual usefulness when it's actual the supporters of FGM who are objectifying women. What man who loves a woman does not want to gratify her as well as himself. This is a beautiful bonding between two people on a very deep level when they are in love. Otherwise, yeah, you might as well be fucking a sex doll. What man wants a woman to be incapable of response. Just stick with fucking goats if you have that little regard for women. What an insult to the creator to insinuate there was a mistake with the female human or the male, for that matter. No modifications are necessary or desirable. We are all fine as we are. It's our belief in lies that needs to be cut out and we would no longer be subject to such fake requirements as FGM and circumcision. I wouldn't worship such deities since they are clearly not supreme beings at all when my integrity and values are stronger than theirs.
 

Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!

Well, you can't say this member isn't living up to his name! Jackass, indeed!

He accuses Alf of only viewing women in terms of sexual usefulness when it's actual the supporters of FGM who are objectifying women. What man who loves a woman does not want to gratify her as well as himself. This is a beautiful bonding between two people on a very deep level when they are in love. Otherwise, yeah, you might as well be fucking a sex doll. What man wants a woman to be incapable of response. Just stick with fucking goats if you have that little regard for women. What an insult to the creator to insinuate there was a mistake with the female human or the male, for that matter. No modifications are necessary or desirable. We are all fine as we are. It's our belief in lies that needs to be cut out and we would no longer be subject to such fake requirements as FGM and circumcision. I wouldn't worship such deities since they are clearly not supreme beings at all when my integrity and values are stronger than theirs.
To sexually objectify women means to value them based solely on the sex they give men, rather than on their personal achievements and work ethic. This is exactly how he and his kind see women. It's for that reason they oppose FGM so sternly. In their mind a woman is worthless unless she's moaning for dick and screaming with orgasms. That's her only function They don't see any other use for women. They don't see her as a fellow human being.
Would you be happy if your daughter was promiscuous and allows many men to have sex with her? I think not.

Anyway as long as male circumcision is illegal it's immoral to throw mothers in prison for FGM.
 
Last edited:

Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!


Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!

Satanica

Veteran Member
Bold Member!
I do agree with you about the double standard.

Promiscuity has nothing to do with the ability to enjoy sex. Our behavior is based in our brains; not our genitals. I would certainly never mutilate my child to prevent possible future misbehavior. That would be barbaric and most likely futile.
 

Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!

Sugar Cookie

Veteran Member
Bold Member!
If we are being realistic and understand human nature there was a time that resources were scarce and a man needed to ensure that his resources were used on his offspring not another man's child.

Why do you think rape is used in war itr not only destroys the woman it destroys the bonds in the community which she identifies in.

If women enjoy and celebrate this barbaric procedure they should remain in their birth countries instead of coming to more advanced societies and forcing others to deal with the emotional and physical destruction this procedure creates.

Like I said mom is not so steeped in her culture that she will forgo chemo.

The difference today is that man have been emasculated and the welfare state allows them to stay with a woman with children and not have to use his resources on her children and sometimes his own.

Let's be clear that is not all men but we at the demon know it happens.
 

Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!

BuffettGirl

Veteran Member
Bold Member!
If we are being realistic and understand human nature there was a time that resources were scarce and a man needed to ensure that his resources were used on his offspring not another man's child.

Why do you think rape is used in war itr not only destroys the woman it destroys the bonds in the community which she identifies in.

If women enjoy and celebrate this barbaric procedure they should remain in their birth countries instead of coming to more advanced societies and forcing others to deal with the emotional and physical destruction this procedure creates.

Like I said mom is not so steeped in her culture that she will forgo chemo.

The difference today is that man have been emasculated and the welfare state allows them to stay with a woman with children and not have to use his resources on her children and sometimes his own.

Let's be clear that is not all men but we at the demon know it happens.
This. All of this.

1553269834345-png.14831
 

Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!

GoneWest

Active Member
Bold Member!
First of all Lithium LOVE:
A) How you’re trying to be relevant again-Bless your heart
B) How you don’t address the fact everyone knows it’s you-closing your eyes doesn’t mean we can’t see you
C) You say it’s about being modest, chaste and demure making women happier-just bc you were a druggie whore who feels bad about herself doesn’t mean everyone should
D) Trying to make this a racial-hint LG, proponents of FG don’t want or need your ignorant whitey ass on their side
E) Have literally zero medical studies to uphold your embarrassingly ignorant claims-instead you say “many studies” or my favorite “some studies”.
F) Your sum total of knowledge comes from a google search of female genital mutilation-not a single MD reference

Just taking an unpopular stance doesn’t make you INTERESTING LG -and in this case it just makes you embarrassing.

Ps: You might want to delete all those post about signing off to go get fucked-not very demure.
 

Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!

PawleysGirl

New Member
I don't know what the fuck you're smoking, but they don't refer to it as mutilation no reason. It has been universally condemed by the United Nations, W.H.O., and UNICEF. Cutting off the clitoris and labia is not the same as cutting off foreskin.
I totally agree with everything you wrote, as do millions of other humans from all first world countries, and even most developing countries. There are zero benefits. It mutilates these young girls for the rest of their lives! The goal is to reduce or eliminate their sex drive completely. Wtf??
 

Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!

MildlyMedicated

Trusted Member
Bold Member!
In The FGM world, they seem to want a Woman, that cannot function sexually, but is willing to be used in a sexual manner for the benefit of her Husband only. Harmless tradition my butt!
She should, be available to her "master" for his pleasure, to create his children, and to keep his home ?
She should not experience anything sexually pleasing. This is total BS. I do not agree with lopping off your children's sex organs. That is like cutting of your 2 year olds hands because he picked up a toy at wal-mart. He may grow up to be a thief stop it NOW.
 

Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!

First of all Lithium LOVE:
A) How you’re trying to be relevant again-Bless your heart
B) How you don’t address the fact everyone knows it’s you-closing your eyes doesn’t mean we can’t see you
C) You say it’s about being modest, chaste and demure making women happier-just bc you were a druggie whore who feels bad about herself doesn’t mean everyone should
D) Trying to make this a racial-hint LG, proponents of FG don’t want or need your ignorant whitey ass on their side
E) Have literally zero medical studies to uphold your embarrassingly ignorant claims-instead you say “many studies” or my favorite “some studies”.
F) Your sum total of knowledge comes from a google search of female genital mutilation-not a single MD reference

Just taking an unpopular stance doesn’t make you INTERESTING LG -and in this case it just makes you embarrassing.

Ps: You might want to delete all those post about signing off to go get fucked-not very demure.
Female Circumcision & Reduction in HIV/AIDS
"Stallings et al. (2005) reported that, in Tanzanian women, the risk of HIV among women who had undergone FGC was roughly half that of women who had not; the association remained significant after adjusting for region, household wealth, age, lifetime partners, union status, and recent ulcer."
http://www.iasociety.org/Default.aspx?pageId=11&abstractId=2177677
"Georgia State University, Public Health Theses" — a USA University of international renown:
The Association between Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) and the Risk of HIV/AIDS in Kenyan Girls and Women (15-49 Years):
"RESULTS: This study shows an inverse association (OR=0.508; 95% CI: 0.376-0.687) between FGM and HIV/AIDS, after adjusting for confounding variables."
"DISCUSSION: The inverse association between FGM and HIV/AIDS established in this study suggests a possible protective effect of female circumcision against HIV/AIDS. This finding suggests therefore the need to authenticate this inverse association in different populations and also to determine the mechanisms for the observed association."
"This study investigated whether there is a direct association between FGM and HIV/AIDS. Surprisingly, the results indicated that the practice of FGM turned out to reduce the risk of HIV. While a positive association was hypothesized, a surprising inverse association between cases of female circumcision and positive HIV serostatus was obtained, hence indicating that FGM may have protective properties against the transmission of HIV."

http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1113&context=iph_theses
"National Bureau of Statistics, Tanzania - 50% reduction in HIV/AIDS in women who have have parts of the genitals amputated:"
http://www.tzonline.org/pdf/femalecircumcisionandhivinfectionintanzania.pdf
Post automatically merged:

In The FGM world, they seem to want a Woman, that cannot function sexually, but is willing to be used in a sexual manner for the benefit of her Husband only. Harmless tradition my butt!
She should, be available to her "master" for his pleasure, to create his children, and to keep his home ?
She should not experience anything sexually pleasing. This is total BS. I do not agree with lopping off your children's sex organs. That is like cutting of your 2 year olds hands because he picked up a toy at wal-mart. He may grow up to be a thief stop it NOW.
You people agree with male circumcision with is much worse and more invasive. Again, for the millionth time, you are hypocrites.
 
Last edited:

Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!


Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!


Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!

Alf

Cereal Box Reader
Bold Member!
Female Circumcision & Reduction in HIV/AIDS
"Stallings et al. (2005) reported that, in Tanzanian women, the risk of HIV among women who had
[...]
"Georgia State University, Public Health Theses"
— a USA University of international renown:
[...]
http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1113&context=iph_theses
"National Bureau of Statistics, Tanzania - 50% reduction in HIV/AIDS in women who have have parts of [...]

You people agree with male circumcision with is much worse and more invasive. Again, for the millionth time, you are hypocrites.
Your first link does not go to the document you cited; instead, it goes to the home page of the International AIDS Society.

Your second link goes to a study whose author notes that there may be various systemic errors in the study but who cites previous research indicating that sexual intercourse may be so uncomfortable for the circumcised woman that she refrains. And less sex equals less HIV infection.

Your third link appears to be dead.

And as for the last claim, this "you people" has made his stance on circumcision clear in a previous post to this thread.

--Al
Post automatically merged:

That's not even something worth discussing. Women value love and romance more than sex.
So love, romance, and painful sex are better than love, romance, and pleasurable sex?

--Al
 
Last edited:

Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!

Fellofftheporch

Understanding things at 20% or less
Bold Member!
That's not even something worth discussing. Women value love and romance more than sex.
It's not? Cause I am pretty sure that an orgasm is pretty important in my book. Can't speak for anyone else though. So, actually it is worth discussing especially cause it does effect sexual pleasure. So, men get to achieve an orgasm while the women are just anxiously awaiting love and romance.
Get the fuck out of here with that ridiculousness.
 
Last edited:

Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!


Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!

Granmaw

Active Member
That's mostly a bunch of Western political propaganda. The practice of "FGM" is relatively harmless and complications are very rare. It's comparable to male circumcision. While you hear lots of horror stories about the vagina being sewed up, the vast majority of the time the practice consists of only cutting off the clitoris and the labia.

This mother did it to her daughter not as "abuse" but as a celebration of her culture and traditions. She sees it as a positive thing for her daughter, just as he sees it for herself.

We need to stop stigmatizing and demonizing people just because they do things that are foreign to us. The West is not a reference point for morality.
You are sadly and grossly misinformed. FGM, even "only cutting off the clitoris and the labia", is most absolutely NOT comparable to traditional male circumcision. Unless they also removed the head of the penis!
 

Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!

GoneWest

Active Member
Bold Member!
So the only medical studies you’ve managed to scrounge center around the one topic you never even brought up. A study that cannot even account for its results. Bravo

Now let’s move on as one can plainly see facts are not going to sway Little Miss White Savior No One Wanted-address points 1-3.

Kudos to you though for bringing your sad bipolar whack a doodle self back to the stage. I’m guessing it’s bc people quit reacting to your previous spew of crap and you felt discarded. But if I was you I’d go back through the archives and delete all your post that expose you for the demon slut you were trying to portray then.

Now I think it’s time for you to go clean something as your little slaves have grown and moved as far away from you as possible.
 

Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!


Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!

Turd Fergusen

Trusted Member
Bold Member!
I'll say this for the tenth time: If you don't want the procedure to be painful then legalize it so it can be done in a hospital with anesthetics.
While we're at it we should probably just enforce Sharia law and cut the hands off of theifs and stone homosexuals. Celebrate that rich cultural heritage! By the way have you heard that vaxxines can cause autism?
 

Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!

Fun fact: Women are twice as likely as men to support FGM. This is likely because women know of the health and moral benefits.

"Data show that in some countries men oppose FGM more strongly than women. In Guinea – the country with the second highest prevalence in the world – 38 per cent of men and boys are against the continuation of FGM, compared to 21 per cent of women and girls. The same pattern is seen in Sierra Leone, where 40 per cent of boys and men want the practice to end, compared to 23 per cent of girls and women.
The most striking difference between men and women’s perceptions regarding FGM is also in Guinea, where 46 per cent of men and boys say FGM has no benefit, compared with just 10 per cent of women and girls."
 

Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!

Siobhan

Tùlach Àrd
Staff member
So the only medical studies you’ve managed to scrounge center around the one topic you never even brought up. A study that cannot even account for its results. Bravo

Now let’s move on as one can plainly see facts are not going to sway Little Miss White Savior No One Wanted-address points 1-3.

Kudos to you though for bringing your sad bipolar whack a doodle self back to the stage. I’m guessing it’s bc people quit reacting to your previous spew of crap and you felt discarded. But if I was you I’d go back through the archives and delete all your post that expose you for the demon slut you were trying to portray then.

Now I think it’s time for you to go clean something as your little slaves have grown and moved as far away from you as possible.
Also, none of the studies on AIDS transmission listed if the women were married to, or with men who'd had circumcisions; by not calculating in this factor, then the results of the study would be statistically flawed and leaning to a falsely higher ratio.
Women have a lower HIV transmission rate to sexual partners among non-IV drug users than men, but are most likely to pass HIV on to their children.

Nothing that's been "provided" for defense of this horrific subject has any well established peer reviews, most of it is clickbait articles, and all of it is diametrically opposed to WHO, AMA and other international medical and psychiatric organization's studies, recommendations, and their affirmation, along with that the of UN, that this brutal child butchery is indeed a HR violation.





:spy:
 
Last edited:

Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!

Kiss_My_Axe

Active Member
Bold Member!
Translation: If we do it then it's ok. If they do it then it's barbaric.
No one should be doing it unless it is medically necessary. Male or female. Why does the body that God gave you need to be modified in any way? So you can chop off parts, but if you’re trans and do it you get thrown off a building in the Middle East. Gays get the same treatment.

Translation: If we do it then it’s ok. If they do it then it’s barbaric.

In my opinion, it’s sad that anyone would want or allow a body part to be removed from their child or otherwise, without it being medically necessary.
 
Last edited:

Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!


Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!

Kiss_My_Axe

Active Member
Bold Member!
This is so stupid. There are plenty of FGM survivors that are miserable and sad because of the trauma inflicted upon them. They can’t lead a normal life. They can’t have functional relationships because they’re embarrassed to explain why their vagina looks odd. These alleged studies can sit and spin on a cactus. They’re probably based on lies anyway. Anyone that thinks this is an acceptable practice, especially to do to children, is demented and the probability is high that they’re a grotesque monster that shouldn’t be near a child or even other humans.
 

Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!

Staff online

Top