• You must be logged in to see or use the Shoutbox. Besides, if you haven't registered, you really should. It's quick and it will make your life a little better. Trust me. So just register and make yourself at home with like-minded individuals who share either your morbid curiousity or sense of gallows humor.

Olivia

Well-Known Member
Dude looks like a 70's porn star.
Kid is 5!!! Wtf is wrong with humanity.

Yes, Richard Zeier said, he did force a boy to urinate in his mouth on three separate occasions, but no, it wasn't sexual.

On March 29, a judge ignored the difference and sentenced Zeier to three and-a-half years in prison and another eight on extended supervision for his crimes, the Pierce County Herald reported. The 70-year-old man will be placed on the sex offender registry for the rest of his life.

The incidents started in 2014 and the grandmother of the victim said it "made our life hell."

He was arrested in 2016 and charged with three counts of first-degree sexual assault with a child younger than 13.

He told investigators that the peeing was something he'd gotten a taste for over the years, but it wasn't sexual, according to the New Richmond News.

After investigators finished their interview with him, they noticed several bottles near his fridge full of urine.

More details came out recently at Zeier's sentencing.

Zeier said he didn't consider it abuse when he was molested by a priest as a child because it was consensual, and he didn't see anything criminal about letting a boy pee into his mouth.

The prosecutor in the case, Ed Misner, described how Zeier would play in the pool with the boy, and buy gifts for him, in an attempt to "groom" him for the abuse.

The abuse, Misner said, will stay with the boy for the rest of his days. He lost some of the innocence of being a child, he continued, according to the Herald.

The judge took issue with Zeier's statements about consent with clergy.

"You, arguably, didn't see it as wrong," the judge said. "It was. Plain and simple. End of discussion."



http://www.oxygen.com/crime-time/man-gets-prison-time-forcing-5-year-old-boy-urinate-mouth
 
Don't understand why he is ever to be let out of a cage. Sickening.

Reminds me of the Louis CK bit. BTW, i have long reconciled with my affinity for his comedy in spite of Louis CKs disgusting behavior, i have come to the conclusion that it makes him even funnier. I mean not only do i have great jokes, but now i have the mental picture of this ginger beast jerkin off on the phone or surprise jerkin off in front of women when they are invited into his dressing room, haha, classic.
 
He developed a taste for it?
:vomit::vomit::vomit::vomit::vomit::vomit::vomit::vomit::vomit::vomit::vomit::vomit::vomit::vomit::vomit::vomit::vomit::vomit::vomit::vomit::vomit::vomit::vomit::vomit::vomit::vomit::vomit::vomit::vomit::vomit::vomit::vomit::vomit:

Dear god a bottle of warm Mountain Dew would taste better.

Now is it all piss?
Only 5 year old boy whiz?
Only male tinkle?
What about animal squirts?
Does he prefer diabetic or non diabetic?
Did he get pranked over a glass of apple juice and just figured fukit?
Is he an expert on vintages? (aaaaahhhh the heady, spring flair of a 2012 caucasoid male...delightful)
:vomit: :vomit::vomit::vomit: :vomit:

Fucking wierdo.
I would say lock him in the bottom of an outhouse but he would think it was Club Med!
 
An actual taste for it warm out of the orifice. Just boys apparently.. Not girls. Or course it's easier all around to get from boys if you want it fresh from the source.
And sure, I'll buy that "nothing sexual" excuse. But that's just you , crazy dude. The boy(s) who pissed in your mouth wont remember it as an innocuous brush off moment, they will be cringing for decades.
Since it isn't "sexual", I'm sure someone in prison will fulfill your warm pee needs. The court will do you a favour sending you to prison.
 
Last edited:
Is it just me, or is it a little less shocking when a chomo looks like a chomo? It always disturbs me a little more when it's a suave mutha... which clearly this guy isn't.
Is that a perm, or is he just blessed?
 
Is it just me, or is it a little less shocking when a chomo looks like a chomo? It always disturbs me a little more when it's a suave mutha... which clearly this guy isn't.
Is that a perm, or is he just blessed?
I concur, I prefer my sleazy pervs to look like sleazy pervs.
 
Back
Top