• You must be logged in to see or use the chatbox

Sugar Cookie

Veteran Member
Bold Member!
A mother has blasted the sentence given to a sex offender who attacked her 10-year-old daughter in a supermarket toilet.

The woman voiced fury that Katie Dolatowski had been freed to serve her sentence in the community.

Dolatowski, 18, sexually assaulted the girl in the toilets of Morrisons, Kirkcaldy.

She grabbed the terrified youngster by the face, shoved her into the cubicle and ordered her to remove her trousers.

The brave schoolgirl, however, punched Dolatowski in the face, stomach and groin and ran to her father and siblings waiting just outside the toilets.

But instead of being jailed at Kirkcaldy Sheriff Court, Dolatowski, who identifies as a woman but was believed by her victim’s family to be a man, was given community payback and tagging orders.

The assault occurred on March 4, last year, a month after Dolatowski had filmed a 12-year-old girl on the toilet in another supermarket in Dunfermline.

The court heard Dolatowski had been in the social care system since the age of three and had mental health issues.
But the mother said: “A lot of people have been in care but they do not go out and assault children.

“I don’t care that he has issues or what his background is, he is a paedophile and he has been let out on a supervision order.”
Dolatowski admitted sexually assaulting the girl and following another girl into the toilets at Asda Halbeath, Dunfermline, on February 8, and trying to film her urinating by holding her mobile phone over the cubicle partition.

Banning her from having contact with children, Sheriff James Williamson gave her what he described as a “stringent” community-based sentence, allowing her to be released from Polmont Young Offenders Institution to supported accommodation.

Dolatowski was considered to pose a “moderate risk” of reoffending but Sheriff Williamson said: “I have come to the conclusion that the public will be better protected by the imposition of a stringent community payback order.”
 

Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!


Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!

Burke

Active Member
This really pisses me off because I just know some people are going to hold up this case in the argument against allowing transgender people into bathrooms...

And the issue isn't that Katie is transgender, it's that she is a sexual deviant who preys on children. The two aren't the same or even similar.

Reminds me of how gay men often got accused of pedophilia during the 60s / 70s / 80s. There surely are gay men who are pedophiles, but not all gay men are, and the two don't naturally coincide.

Preying on children is wrong regardless of identity.
 

Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!


Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!


Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!

JackBurton

Veteran Member
Bold Member!
So does the media not know the actual gender? It says the person identifies as female but the victims family believes it is a male. So can we not get an actual fucking answer on this???

The family is living in the wrong country if they want justice. How is any person in Europe of the mindset where they thirst for actual punishments for criminals? Figured theyd have long accepted that will never exist cuz the pussy govts love criminals and dont care about the citizenry.
 

Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!

Burke

Active Member
So does the media not know the actual gender? It says the person identifies as female but the victims family believes it is a male. So can we not get an actual fucking answer on this
The article reports Katie is female. The family member quoted refers to Katie as "he" because the family is blaming Katie's predatory behavior on the fact that Katie was marked "male" at birth.

In case that's still unclear, Katie was once considered male and the family assumes only men can be sexual predators so they continue to address her as a man.
 

Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!

JackBurton

Veteran Member
Bold Member!
The article reports Katie is female. The family member quoted refers to Katie as "he" because the family is blaming Katie's predatory behavior on the fact that Katie was marked "male" at birth.

In case that's still unclear, Katie was once considered male and the family assumes only men can be sexual predators so they continue to address her as a man.
So it IS a MALE who identifies as a FEMALE.

The way it was written made it unclear i felt as to what exactly was going on
 

Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!

Burke

Active Member
So it IS a MALE who identifies as a FEMALE.

The way it was written made it unclear i felt as to what exactly was going on
In the fourth paragraph, the article says Katie identifies as female. It addresses her as either her last name or feminine pronouns everywhere else. That's typical of these types of articles.

The family is quoted multiple times and consistently refers to Katie as male, which introduces some confusion.
 

Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!


Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!

Sugar Cookie

Veteran Member
Bold Member!
@Burke

1. Is it just possible she looks like a male and the child described her as male to the police and family.

While I might be nice and kind in general, if you hurt me or one of mine I honestly would not give a fuck what you identify as or want to be called.

2. Society still has a hard time accepting that females can be pedophiles. We at DD know that it is more common than most people like to think.

The sentence is ridiculous. Katie is going to work on her grooming skills and befriending someone who will trust her around their child.
 

Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!


Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!

Burke

Active Member
1. Is it just possible she looks like a male and the child described her as male to the police and family.

2. Society still has a hard time accepting that females can be pedophiles. We at DD know that it is more common than most people like to think.

The sentence is ridiculous. Katie is going to work on her grooming skills and befriending someone who will trust her around their child.
I think Mom is emphasizing Katie's maleness because it figures into the sexual assault - either because Mom believes only men are sexual predators, or because Katie has a penis and used it in the sexual assault, or both.

The sentence is ridiculous, probably suggested by her behavior in foster care or emergency / psych care. I don't understand it and I hope your prediction is wrong... but it's probably accurate.

Here's hoping Katie gets herself in trouble and gets a more restrictive sentence without anyone getting hurt.
 

Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!


Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!


Don't like ads? Then help out the site and GO BOLD!

Staff online

Members online

Top