• You must be logged in to see or use the Shoutbox. Besides, if you haven't registered, you really should. It's quick and it will make your life a little better. Trust me. So just register and make yourself at home with like-minded individuals who share either your morbid curiousity or sense of gallows humor.

Sugar Cookie

Veteran Member
Bold Member!
plasticsexdoll.jpeg


A Kentucky judge has dropped a child pornography charge against Scott L. Phillips who ordered sex dolls resembling an infant and a 6 to 8-year-old girl.

Judge Douglas Grothaus dismissed the charge of having an item portraying a sexual performance by a minor, saying there was no actual child involved. Kenton Commonwealth Attorney Rob Sanders says he may appeal the case, which he says is a first for his office.

Police tracked a package from China to 41-year-old Scott L. Phillips' home, where they served a search warrant and found the anatomically correct female dolls. He also was charged with marijuana possession.

Federal legislation called the Curbing Realistic Exploitative Electronic Pedophilic Robots Act would ban child sex dolls and is being considered.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As gross and weird as it is, he didnt hurt an actual child. While it's all good that the charges were dropped, this man was damaged by this.

The funny (not so funny) if there was an actual child, it's possible his identity would not have been released to protect the child but still giving him the benefit of anonymity.
 
Oh no, pieces of plastic are being sexually abused, we must put a stop to this immoral activity.

They could recycle the plastic everyone’s so fucked off about right now.....can’t be having that either
Post automatically merged:

If this came from China, wouldn't this be a normal sized sex doll? Those Chinese are pretty damn small.

That’s if it turns up next month
 
These "dolls" stories come up every few years. Last time was that guy in Canada who claimed he was getting them to remember a child of his that passed away or something. I personally say it's CP. Should be illegal.

Who the fuck is making these things anyway? Who are they modeled from?
 
These "dolls" stories come up every few years. Last time was that guy in Canada who claimed he was getting them to remember a child of his that passed away or something. I personally say it's CP. Should be illegal.

Who the fuck is making these things anyway? Who are they modeled from?
It's creepy, gross and disgusting. But it's not a person. Why make it illegal? He didn't actually hurt anyone. Again if he get beat down I'll be happy, but to make it a law gets close to policing thought.
 
These "dolls" stories come up every few years. Last time was that guy in Canada who claimed he was getting them to remember a child of his that passed away or something. I personally say it's CP. Should be illegal.

Who the fuck is making these things anyway? Who are they modeled from?
Anti-childporn laws exist ostensibly to protect children. No children are harmed here. If he wants to bang a piece of plastic/latex/whatever, he can imagine it's whatever he wants. Because its imagination. As long as he keeps those hands to himself and does his thing in private, there's no problem.
 
I think there was a child or baby who died and the doll was meant to help with the mourning process or something, but I could be thinking of a different case with these dolls.
 
The legal definition of child pornography in the US is: .....any means of depicting or promoting sexual abuse of a child, including print and/or audio, centered on sex acts or the genital organs of children.

That means a child sex doll is child porn. There is nothing in the legal definition that says it has to be a real person. You can do just as must time in jail if you have 100 actual child porn videos or if they are cartoons.
 
The legal definition of child pornography in the US is: .....any means of depicting or promoting sexual abuse of a child, including print and/or audio, centered on sex acts or the genital organs of children.

That means a child sex doll is child porn. There is nothing in the legal definition that says it has to be a real person. You can do just as must time in jail if you have 100 actual child porn videos or if they are cartoons.
Incorrect, actually. Here's the actual law in US is (make sure to read subsections 8 & 11):
18 U.S. Code CHAPTER 110—SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND OTHER ABUSE OF CHILDREN

18 U.S. Code § 2256.Definitions for chapter


For the purposes of this chapter, the term—
(1)
minor” means any person under the age of eighteen years;
(2)
(A)Except as provided in subparagraph (B), “sexually explicit conduct” means actual or simulated—
(i)
sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex;
(ii)
bestiality;
(iii)
masturbation;
(iv)
sadistic or masochistic abuse; or
(v)
lascivious exhibition of the anus, genitals, or pubic area of any person;
(B)For purposes of subsection 8(B) [1] of this section, “sexually explicit conduct”means—
(i)
graphic sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex, or lascivious simulated sexual intercourse where the genitals, breast, or pubic area of any person is exhibited;
(ii)graphic or lascivious simulated;
(I)
bestiality;
(II)
masturbation; or
(III)
sadistic or masochistic abuse; or
(iii)
graphic or simulated lascivious exhibition of the anus, genitals, or pubic area of any person;
(3)
producing” means producing, directing, manufacturing, issuing, publishing, or advertising;
(4)
organization” means a person other than an individual;
(5)
visual depiction” includes undeveloped film and videotape, data stored on computer disk or by electronic means which is capable of conversion into a visual image, and data which is capable of conversion into a visual image that has been transmitted by any means, whether or not stored in a permanent format;
(6)
computer” has the meaning given that term in section 1030 of this title;
(7)
custody or control” includes temporary supervision over or responsibility for a minor whether legally or illegally obtained;
(8)“child pornography” means any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where—
(A)
the production of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
(B)
such visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or
(C)
such visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct.
(9)“identifiable minor”—
(A)means a person
(i)
(I)
who was a minor at the time the visual depiction was created, adapted, or modified; or
(II)
whose image as a minor was used in creating, adapting, or modifying the visual depiction; and
(ii)
who is recognizable as an actual person by the person’s face, likeness, or other distinguishing characteristic, such as a unique birthmark or other recognizable feature; and
(B)
shall not be construed to require proof of the actual identity of the identifiable minor.
(10)
“graphic”, when used with respect to a depiction of sexually explicit conduct, means that a viewer can observe any part of the genitals or pubic area of any depicted person or animal during any part of the time that the sexually explicit conduct is being depicted; and
(11)
the term “indistinguishable” used with respect to a depiction, means virtually indistinguishable, in that the depiction is such that an ordinary person viewing the depiction would conclude that the depiction is of an actual minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct. This definition does not apply to depictions that are drawings, cartoons, sculptures, or paintings depicting minors or adults.

A doll is not an actual minor, nor is it indistinguishable from an actual minor. A doll is a form of sculpture, which is allowed. Nor are drawings, cartoons, or paintings prohibited.

To tell people what they can, and can not, do with a piece of rubber and plastic in their own homes smacks of returning to the days of anti-homosexuality laws, worse even.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top