• You must be logged in to see or use the Shoutbox. Besides, if you haven't registered, you really should. It's quick and it will make your life a little better. Trust me. So just register and make yourself at home with like-minded individuals who share either your morbid curiousity or sense of gallows humor.

Turd Fergusen

Veteran Member
Bold Member!
19704

A custodian at Florida’s Walt Disney World has been charged with possessing child pornography — and believes it’s his constitutional right to look at graphic photos and videos of kids online, authorities said.

Paul G. Curley, 66, was arrested Wednesday on six counts of possession of child pornography after detectives in Osceola County got a tip from the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children about nude images of children between ages 5 and 12 being downloaded from a residential address, according to a charging affidavit.

Detectives then served a warrant at Curley’s apartment in Celebration, where he confessed to searching for child porn using his home computer as recently as earlier that morning. Curley even had open browser tabs showing a child porn website and others he used to search for similar content, according to the affidavit.

Curley, who claimed he was looking at the revolting images for “investigative purposes,” insisted to detectives that he wasn’t a criminal because he didn’t download or share the content, but simply watched it.

“He stated his constitutional rights allow him to view the child pornography,” the affidavit reads. “He does not feel that he is guilty of a crime.”

Full Story:
https://nypost.com/2019/06/28/disney-custodian-thinks-watching-child-porn-is-his-constitutional-right-cops/
 
Didn’t download it and didn’t share it?

Several states have ruled that a person cannot be convicted of "possessing" child pornography based on merely viewing pornographic images a home computer. Pennsylvania, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin have had similar rulings on the issue. When an image is viewed on a computer, that image is "cached" by the web browser. That means it may exist on the computer without the person ever making an attempt to download the image. Though the person may have been aware of what they were viewing, they may have been unaware that they were automatically downloaded and saved to his computer, and therefore, didn't "knowingly possess" the pornography as state law requires. Even if the person saw what the site contained and immediately left, the image would have been on their computer and that was deemed insufficient for a child pornography conviction.

https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/legal-considerations-for-child-pornography-cases-31056
 
Well, he may not be far off. The LGBTQ-XYZ movement is pushing hard to make pedophilia a normal sexual orientation. And then there’s presidential candidates saying that it’s a woman’s constitutional right to kill her baby up to and after birth.
Ooh! Are we playing Internet Strawman Post Bonanza? I wanna play too!
It's just like how Republicans are pushing hard to make it illegal to be non-white and legalize burning gays at the stake and are trying pass laws making it illegal to have sex except for the purpose of making children!

Oh wait, no one's doing any of those things. Just like with the things you listed.
Well I mean Nazis probably want a couple of those things, but they're batshit insane and don't represent any significant portion of the population.
 
Dude works at F***ING DISNEY!!!!!! WTF!
He's a janitor at Disney World and plays the role of the classic creepy janitor to the "T".

19722

Paul "I love my job, but when I get home I need to work off the tension from being around all those sexy youngsters, thank God for my Constitutional right to perv on some on-line child porn" Curley
 
Last edited:
No we're not. That's NAMBLA. And it's disgusting.
No we're not. That's NAMBLA. And it's disgusting.
Post automatically merged:

I don’t care one way or the other if someone’s gay. I’m just commenting on what I read.
 
Didn’t download it and didn’t share it?

Several states have ruled that a person cannot be convicted of "possessing" child pornography based on merely viewing pornographic images a home computer. Pennsylvania, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin have had similar rulings on the issue. When an image is viewed on a computer, that image is "cached" by the web browser. That means it may exist on the computer without the person ever making an attempt to download the image. Though the person may have been aware of what they were viewing, they may have been unaware that they were automatically downloaded and saved to his computer, and therefore, didn't "knowingly possess" the pornography as state law requires. Even if the person saw what the site contained and immediately left, the image would have been on their computer and that was deemed insufficient for a child pornography conviction.

https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/legal-considerations-for-child-pornography-cases-31056
Well if the law can't get him, at least he's been outed and hopefully Disneyland will fire his ass and restrain him from all Disney resorts.
Post automatically merged:

Post automatically merged:


I don’t care one way or the other if someone’s gay. I’m just commenting on what I read.
From your link.
. Pedophiles are attempting to rebrand themselves as “MAPs” or “Minor Attracted Persons” in an effort to normalize pedophilia and gain acceptance in mainstream America by being included as part of the expanding LGBT+ community umbrella.
From your very own source.
It says pedos are trying but it doesn't say the LGBT community is embracing them.

So STFU with your false, hate posts.
 
Last edited:
Really? News Punch? lol :D

They have great "news" stories including the Illuminati's combined use of chem-clouds, along with toxic pre-natal vaccinations for its plan to enslave humanity. They also have money saving articles, like which aluminum provides the best protection when making a tin foil hat when one is on a budget.

Here's News Punch (aka YoursNewsWire) listing at Media Bias:
News Punch - Questionable Source - Fake News
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, we rate News Punch a Questionable source based on extreme right wing bias and promotion of tin foil hat conspiracies. This website has zero credibility due to routine publishing of fake news


Detailed Report
Reasoning Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Fake News
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180
History

Founded in November 2018, News Punch is a Los Angeles-based clickbait news website that promotes extreme right wing conspiracy theories and pseudoscience misinformation. The website is founded and edited by Sean Adl-Tabatabai, who was the founder of YourNewsWire. In fact, News Punch is actually YourNewsWire redirected under a new domain name with a clean attractive website. All previous fake YourNewsWire stories have been ported over to this website/domain. Not much has changed.
Funded by / Ownership
News Punch claims on its website that it is owned by a holding company called The People’s Voice, inc. The website is funded through an online advertising model.
Analysis / Bias
In review, News Punch (aka YourNewsWire) is a far right wing conspiracy and pseudoscience website that also routinely publishes fake news. Headlines use loaded emotional language such as this: I Was In The Illuminati I’m Going To Tell You Everything, Shocking Expose. Politically, story selection almost always favors the right through negative stories regarding liberal policy and politicians such as this: CIA Insider: Hillary Clinton Most Treasonous Leader In History. Further, the sources utilized by News Punch are some of the least credible out there, such as Infowars and the Gateway Pundit.
News Punch routinely publishes anti-vaccination propaganda, stories of impending world war 3 and extraterrestrial stories, just to name a few. Further, YourNewsWire (Now News Punch) has made Factcheck.org’s fake news list. as well as having an abysmal track record with fact checkers. Finally, according to Poynter Institute, YourNewsWire (News Punch) has more false claims by IFCN fact checkers than any other website.
Overall, we rate News Punch a Questionable source based on extreme right wing bias and promotion of tin foil hat conspiracies. This website has zero credibility due to routine publishing of fake news. (D. Van Zandt 11/13/2018)
Source: https://newspunch.com

 
Last edited:
Well, he may not be far off. The LGBTQ-XYZ movement is pushing hard to make pedophilia a normal sexual orientation. And then there’s presidential candidates saying that it’s a woman’s constitutional right to kill her baby up to and after birth.
They're really not, bruh... That's not a thing... I gotta take care not to roll my eyes so hard my forehead hurts...
 
Well, he may not be far off. The LGBTQ-XYZ movement is pushing hard to make pedophilia a normal sexual orientation. And then there’s presidential candidates saying that it’s a woman’s constitutional right to kill her baby up to and after birth.
Leather face, what you just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response, were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having read it. I am baffled that you typed it, but more so that you posted it. Yes, i got Billy Madison to help respond to you, because it is so fitting. Your first point, is so unbelievably wrong, and your second shows your lack of understanding the difference between Constitutional, and Human rights. Please educate yourself, in this day in age, ignorance is a choice.
 
Leather face, what you just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response, were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having read it. I am baffled that you typed it, but more so that you posted it. Yes, i got Billy Madison to help respond to you, because it is so fitting. Your first point, is so unbelievably wrong, and your second shows your lack of understanding the difference between Constitutional, and Human rights. Please educate yourself, in this day in age, ignorance is a choice.

I'm now officially tired of repeating myself. I am going to start thread-banning people.

The Demon is not your fucking political playground, folks. You've got the whole rest of the internet for that.

ETA: Or that dumpster fire called "Three Things."
 
Last edited:
Who the hell wants that? Which candidate?
Any of the democrats. I hate both parties too btw.
Post automatically merged:

Leather face, what you just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response, were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having read it. I am baffled that you typed it, but more so that you posted it. Yes, i got Billy Madison to help respond to you, because it is so fitting. Your first point, is so unbelievably wrong, and your second shows your lack of understanding the difference between Constitutional, and Human rights. Please educate yourself, in this day in age, ignorance is a choice.
I don’t normally comment on political parties. My point wasn’t political other than citing facts. Everybody on here wants to get all indignant about kids getting harmed with all the horrendous stories on DD posts but somehow don’t give flying fuck about the kids that are just born.
 
Last edited:
Alrighty then. 24-hour thread ban for @TX Leather Face.

@Morbid does not want the threads on this forum derailed by political squabbling. It's a turn-off to everyone except the people doing the squabbling, including (importantly) people whose financial support keeps the site running.

There's a whole sub-forum called Three Things for fighting, fussing and feuding. Please do your bickering there.

And when a thread devolves into a political shit-show, and a mod asks everyone to knock it off, then knock it off. That means no one gets to have the last word.
 
Back
Top