• You must be logged in to see or use the Shoutbox. Besides, if you haven't registered, you really should. It's quick and it will make your life a little better. Trust me. So just register and make yourself at home with like-minded individuals who share either your morbid curiousity or sense of gallows humor.

Sugar Cookie

Veteran Member
Bold Member!
  • Jan 2, 2018
Andrew Glasser, 32 of Bismarck, was charged with child abuse and tampering with evidence.

The victim, a female infant, was found with rib injuries and trauma to the left tibia and fibula that were in the process of healing.

Glasser said those injuries occurred when he pushed the infant's legs toward her stomach in order to relieve gas.

A doctor's examination concluded that "way too much force" would have to be used in order to cause that type of injury.

Upon further examination the doctor found the infant had suffered a vaginal tear consistent with "penetrating trauma."

During an interview with authorities the mother of the child admitted that Glasser had told her the victim was bleeding from her vagina and she may need stitches.

The mother directed Glasser to take the victim to the hospital, but he did not. The mother confirmed to police that during the time of the injuries that no other individuals had access to the child.

Glasser has been charged with gross sexual imposition of a victim under 15 years of age.

He was also charged with tampering with evidence after authorities found he manually reset his phone in order to wipe it.
http://www.ktvq.com/story/36747150/bismarck-man-accused-of-raping-infant
 
Last edited:
Glasser said those injuries occurred when he pushed the infant's legs toward her stomach in order to relieve gas.

Because that's really believable. :sarcasm:

Upon further examination the doctor found the infant had suffered a vaginal tear consistent with "penetrating trauma."
During an interview with authorities the mother of the child admitted that Glasser had told her the victim was bleeding from her vagina and she may need stitches.

That mother... why isn't this guy six feet under?
 
So mommy never realizes baby girl has injuries to her ribs and thigh bone, then is told by dick of the month that baby is bleeding from her vagina and needs stitches and mommy dearest there tells him to take her to the doctor? WTF is really wrong with the mother? We obviously know he is a sick baby rapper but she allowed full access to this baby even when he told her about an injury that would have sent any sane mother to the er to help he baby and the cops to pick up his beaten unconscious body.
 
@Satanica

Jul 17, 2019
A Bismarck man accused of abusing and raping an infant girl and possessing prohibited materials two years ago changed his pleas Wednesday on 12 of the 13 charges against him.

Andrew Glasser, 33, of Bismarck, appeared before South Central District Judge David Reich, who accepted his guilty pleas for abusing a child, tampering with evidence and 10 counts of possessing child pornography.

Glasser did not change his not guilty plea on a charge of gross sexual imposition, a AA felony that carries a maximum sentence of life in prison without parole. Burleigh County State’s Attorney Julie Lawyer and defense attorneys Lloyd Suhr and Bob Bolinske Jr. agreed to await the results of a presentence investigation, which will include sex offender and psychological evaluations, before giving that charge more consideration. The charge could be dismissed or modified, Glasser could change his plea, or that portion of the case could continue to trial.
 
BISMARCK, N.D. - A North Dakota man accused of abusing and raping an infant has been sentenced to four years in prison, according to the Bismarck Tribune.

Andrew Glasser, 33, entered an 'Alford plea' on Monday to sexual assault.
[....]
Glasser pleaded guilty to abusing a child, tampering with evidence and 10 counts of possessing child pornography in July.

According to the Tribune, Glasser must spend five years on probation in addition to his four year prison sentence.

You can read more about the case HERE.
https://www.fox4news.com/news/polic...ina-morris?amp_js_v=0.1&usqp=mq331AQFKAGwASA=

 
Has anyone had any luck finding out how the baby girl herself is doing now? I found a facebook page for a Bismarck news outlet that covered it back in 2017. A few commenters said that he was married, and he and his wife already had a young son, and she had just given birth to their baby girl back in July.

I'm surprised the victim survived the abuse at all. I hope she was able to recover as much as possible and is now living with someone who will show her the love, care, and protection that her egg and sperm donors did not.

“I’m trying to get my life back after it stopped on a dime two years ago,” Glasser said.


He doesn't give a damn about the child who may never walk properly or be able to have biological children because of his horrific, selfish choices. It's just about him and his needs and wants. She doesn't matter to him.

I hope he dies in prison.
 
The only upside to this is that the girl is too young to remember the sexual trauma (unfortunately it lives on online). I hope he never sees her again, along with the mother. Could totally see this being a repeater if he had access to her again. Shit, even on another kid.
 
A Bismarck man who submitted forged letters of support before being sentenced in February for raping an infant will spend 16 years in prison instead of four.

During Friday's hearing, the judge who handed down both sentences also addressed the public outcry sparked by the first sentence, saying he's influenced by evidence and the law, and not by public opinion.

Andrew Glasser, 35, was sentenced to four years in prison after entering an Alford plea to a charge of sexual assault. He pleaded guilty in July 2019 in a related case to abusing a child, tampering with evidence and 10 counts of possessing child pornography.

The cases were reopened -- and three misdemeanor forgery charges filed -- when it came to light that Glasser signed the name of a former college acquaintance to a letter that was submitted prior to his sentencing. The man whose name was signed to the letter sent a notarized letter to the court and asked that his name be removed from the state court website. Glasser on Friday pleaded guilty to the forgery charges before being resentenced.

The letters were one of the factors considered in determining Glasser’s new sentence, South Central District Judge David Reich said. He expects letters from a defendant’s family to be positive, he said, but letters from a third person or a stranger carry considerable weight. After finding out three letters were faked, “I have to look at everything that was submitted on behalf of Mr. Glasser differently in light of the fact that he submitted these forged documents,” Reich said.

Burleigh County State’s Attorney Julie Lawyer referenced two more phony letters in a March brief in which she asked that Glasser be resentenced. Lawyer on Friday asked for a 20-year sentence with all but 10 years suspended and five years of probation. Her request was made not only because Reich might have relied on the letters in sentencing but because the act of forgery says a lot about Glasser, she said.


“It goes toward the defendant’s character; it goes toward his entire mindset as to how seriously he considered these charges,” Lawyer said.

Defense attorney Kent Morrow, who took the case after the forged letters were submitted, said the issue was whether the letters were so persuasive that they were the only reason the earlier sentence was imposed. The letters were exposed for what they were, he said, which was “a middle school attempt to gain some sympathy.” He asked Reich to add a year to Glasser’s four-year sentence due to the forgery.
Glasser apologized for his actions and said the letters were “not an attempt to try to hurt any individual involved.”

Backlash addressed
Glasser's initial sentence drew criticism in social media comments and emails to the Tribune from around the country.

Reich said the court received letters and emails about the initial sentence, all of which became part of the record in the case. He also said he does not use social media but heard about the online backlash.

“I really don’t care,” Reich said.

He appreciated that people followed the case but noted that none of them were at the crime scene, none of them were at the sentencing, and likely none of them read the transcript of the hearing.

“This isn’t like ancient Rome where we go out in the coliseum and we ask the people for a thumbs up or a thumbs down for a sentence,” Reich said. “This is something that the court needs to make based on all the evidence and information that’s been provided."
Reaction to Reich’s initial sentence ranged from disbelief to anger. Reich when contacted by the Tribune at that time said he was "ethically precluded" by judicial rules from commenting on the sentence.
Glasser was originally charged in October 2017. The baby allegedly had an injury evident of sexual abuse, rib fractures caused by squeezing, and leg injuries that were in different stages of healing. Glasser’s cellphone had been purposely reset to hide evidence, and a forensic search of his computers showed the intentional downloading of child pornography images, according to Lawyer.


The child suffered a “significant injury,” and three doctors said it was a “penetrating wound,” Lawyer said during previous court proceedings.
 
Last edited:
March 18, 2021 by A Iverson, Organizer
Trial was today and..judge Rommanick ruled in our favor. His parental rights have been terminated!!!

Thank you everyone for your support!! Now we celebrate!

Feb 24, 2021
A year ago Wednesday a Bismarck man was sentenced to prison for abusing and raping his infant daughter.

Although he is behind bars today, the mother of the victim says she has one more battle to fight. She asked that her name be left out of the story because she says she’s been attacked on social media in the past over what happened to her now 3-and-a-half-year-old daughter.

The man responsible is 34-year-old Andrew Glasser. He is currently serving a 16-year prison sentence.

Back in 2017, Glasser had no prior charges of this nature when he watched their children while the mother worked. She came home one night to find her 11-week-old daughter bleeding, and would never have imagined what would be discovered by doctors.

“I got home from work later that night and I checked her diaper, and there was an injury that should not have been there,” she said, laying out the events that night in October 2017.

“I took her to the walk-in clinic. They sent me to the emergency room, sent me home, went to the pediatrician the next morning. It was doctor number 4 to finally tell me kind of like, ‘This is sexual trauma.'”

Three and a half years later, the young girl is healthy.

“Thankfully babies heal fast and you wouldn’t know her from any other 3-year-old because she’s so little she doesn’t remember anything,” her mother shared.

That said, she knows one day she’ll have to have that conversation with her daughter before she finds out on her own. With the possibility of Andrew Glasser’s release before her 18th birthday, the mother of two filed to terminate his parental rights and to change both of her children’s last names.

“He’s set to get out October 27, 2030. My daughter will be 13 years old,” she explained.

When asked if she’s concerned about losing child support, she told me, “I don’t get child support now. At that point whenever he gets released, I’ll have been doing it so long by myself that child support, honestly like…” She shrugged.

“I don’t know. I don’t need it. I mean it’d be nice but it’s not something that I’m used to getting.”

And, although the conditions of his judgment say Glasser cannot contact or be within 100 yards of the victim, these terms go away when he completes probation. The mother says she can’t let that happen.

“When you are terminating someone’s parental rights, that does not automatically extinguish a child support obligation,” Heartland Law Office Attorney Patrick Waters chimed in.

Waters says, while bound by the probation conditions Glasser still retains other rights as a parent, like access to his kids’ medical records.

According to the mother, the termination would ensure even if something happens to her, he cannot step in as a parent.

“I think the mother is doing what she feels is right and she should do that,” Waters concluded.

He says he can’t say for sure without all of the facts, but he believes she likely has a strong case.

“I feel like this is the best option for the kids because they need to know they are protected, that if you hurt kids, you’re not going to get away with it. You don’t get to have those ties,” the mother said, looking to the future.

This legal action does come with a price tag.

The mother tells me the day in court, alone, to terminate Glasser’s parental rights will cost her around $2,400. To fight back won’t cost Glasser a dime. He’s given a court-appointed attorney.

Meanwhile, Glasser is fighting to reduce his current sentence in the state Supreme Court.
 
Back
Top