alfiewing
Active Member
she could be back inside if the fatal accident inquiry can find evidence she regularly left the mite on his own.
if theres enough witnesses and proof she was here, there and wherever and noone to say they had the child for her.
the childs father said his son wasnt a priority for him and neither was kim herself.
he didnt even know the childs birthday, never met him and never paid a penny towards him. scumbag.
it will be so wrong if she gets no further time if she did cause the childs death and has only not had many years inside due to leaving the body to decompose so long.
it would basically mean its a way to get away with murder if you made out you were too mentally disturbed to report the death.
if theres enough witnesses and proof she was here, there and wherever and noone to say they had the child for her.
the childs father said his son wasnt a priority for him and neither was kim herself.
he didnt even know the childs birthday, never met him and never paid a penny towards him. scumbag.
it will be so wrong if she gets no further time if she did cause the childs death and has only not had many years inside due to leaving the body to decompose so long.
it would basically mean its a way to get away with murder if you made out you were too mentally disturbed to report the death.
