tmdgirl
The girl who waited....forever.
I remember this case very well. I followed it when it happened and have tried to keep up with new developments whenever they pop up.
I agree that the case was extremely biased against Darlie, but I do not believe for one second that she wasn't part of what happened to her boys.
There are a number of pieces of evidence that do not add up, but there are also strong ties to her that were the grounds for the case against her. I strongly believe that the husband was also involved in this case. I think that it was her part to kill the boys, and his job was to make it look like she was attacked (although it would have been better for him if she died).
The wounds she suffered were mostly superficial, except for the knife wound to her throat (which would have had to have been deeper and a little further down to actually kill her), and the unexplained bruising to her arms. Based on the evidence presented at her trial she "supposedly" inflicted some of her wounds herself. I think the husband was the one to cut her throat, and the bruises were from her fighting him off.
I would like to see him more thoroughly investigated, and his business and personal financial records gone through to see what he had to gain by the deaths of his wife and children.
Don't shoot me on this one, just stating some of what I think :smile:
I agree that the case was extremely biased against Darlie, but I do not believe for one second that she wasn't part of what happened to her boys.
There are a number of pieces of evidence that do not add up, but there are also strong ties to her that were the grounds for the case against her. I strongly believe that the husband was also involved in this case. I think that it was her part to kill the boys, and his job was to make it look like she was attacked (although it would have been better for him if she died).
The wounds she suffered were mostly superficial, except for the knife wound to her throat (which would have had to have been deeper and a little further down to actually kill her), and the unexplained bruising to her arms. Based on the evidence presented at her trial she "supposedly" inflicted some of her wounds herself. I think the husband was the one to cut her throat, and the bruises were from her fighting him off.
I would like to see him more thoroughly investigated, and his business and personal financial records gone through to see what he had to gain by the deaths of his wife and children.
Don't shoot me on this one, just stating some of what I think :smile: